• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Illegal Bailouts Threaten Economic Recovery

    Rule of law? Who needs it!

    That seemed to be the message of the Obama Administration as it seeks to maneuver around restrictions imposed by Congress on bailout recipients. As the Washington Post describes, the Administration is laundering money to bailout recipients by “set[ing] up special entities that act as middlemen, channeling the bailout funds to the firms and, via this two-step process, stripping away the requirement that the restrictions be imposed, according to officials.”

    The end result of this scheming is that measures like caps on executive pay and limits on bonuses simply don’t apply to businesses receiving bailout bucks. That assumes, of course, that this maneuvering is legal. The University of Pennsylvania’s David Zaring, who worked on related issues in the Department of Justice, think not: “They are trying to create a loophole to ignore Congress, and I think the courts will think that it’s ridiculous.”

    The Administration’s gaming is driven by pragmatism, to be sure. Congress imposed a bunch of counterproductive, micromanaging requirements to go along with government dollars, and these terms are scaring participants away from the government’s economic rescue programs. And meddling with the internal affairs of private companies is almost always bad policy.

    But the worse policy is this never-ending parade of bailouts, which has injected an enormous amount of uncertainty and risk into financial markets. As the government extends its reach into more sectors of the economy, the uncertainty only grows. The result is paralysis: It’s dangerous to make an investment when the government may sweep in tomorrow and upset everything.

    Outright evisceration of the rule of law, even for what seem to be pragmatic reasons, is even more dangerous, because it throws every transaction, every investment, every deal into question. Doing business becomes more risky and far more expensive. That’s why countries that don’t respect the rule of law are, by and large, very poor. The link between rule of law and prosperity is strong.

    In the United States, Congress writes the laws, and it is the executive branch’s duty to execute them, even if they’re dumb and counterproductive. It may be that this system of government, or any system of government, is simply ill-equipped to bailout and then manage large sectors of the private economy—politics and profits just don’t mix. In that case, we should stop doing bailouts and act to unwind those already done.

    Attempting an end-run around our laws, however, is no solution at all. It only risks far greater failure.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Illegal Bailouts Threaten Economic Recovery

    1. jeff, FL says:

      Read this

    2. gopack says:

      Remember the goal of the Obama Administration is to use the emergency bailouts to own the corporate sector not turn the economy around. Whereby it is a constant reminder his adminstration will stop at nothing, firmly believing "The End Justifies the Means".

      "The End Justifies the Means":

      A consequentialist may allow that certain foreseeable consequences might make lying acceptable, (Perfect example of all the Obama campaign lies…Obama's broken promises in the first 100 days!) A deontologist might argue that lying is always wrong, regardless of any perceived "good" that might come from lying. A virtue ethicist, however, would focus less on lying in any particular instance and instead consider what a decision to tell a lie or not tell a lie said about one's character. Clearly, Obama, his administration and our current Congress, have no virtue character as they make an orgy of spending our tax dollars with no regard of how this will negatively affect future generations of Americans.

    3. Barb -mn says:

      Everything congress and the Obama administration is doing is preventing economic recovery!

    4. Scarlett007 Tucson says:

      Well, there you have it! What is it and why is it always said, that "Democrats are always about tax and spend" a saying which has been around for the last century. Something that has been said so long is true, as proven by every Democratic President we've had, with the lone exception (possibly not) of John F. Kennedy. I for one, am sick to death of it. I may be a Republican and Catholic to boot, but that is neither here nor there. What I'm sick of is lying, spending to make no money nor to help the average American, no, they like to put the taxes on our backs to pay all these unholy deeds back! Enough, I say!!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×