Global Warming Legislation vs. Largest Government Projects in History
Posted April 2nd, 2009 at 4.19pm in Energy and Environment.

Add together NASA since its inception, the cost of Hurricane Katrina and spending on the New Deal. Adjust for inflation. What do you get? Not quite the amount of money a cap and trade program would generate in energy taxes on consumers. The $1.9 trillion generated over eight years from a cap-and-trade bill would still be larger than the $1.5 trillion from NASA, the New Deal, and Hurricane Katrina.
Granted, this is comparing apples to oranges to lemons as NASA and the New Deal are government spending projects, Hurricane Katrina was general economic damage and “climate revenue” from a cap and trade is a tax, but it gives you an idea of how big this program really is. In fact, CNBC has a slide show of the biggest spending items in the federal government’s history and, after adjusting for inflation, only World War II ($3.6 trillion) is greater than the tax collection from capping carbon dioxide.
Keep in mind, this is an enormous energy tax for absolutely nothing in return, unless you consider lots of economic pain (higher prices, hundreds of thousands of jobs lost per year) with no environmental benefit a good investment of taxpayer money.

April 2, 2009 gary, freeland mi writes:
Hey, since we are just printing the money, and no one seems to care about the national debt (kind of like the idiots who bought houses they new they couldn’t afford) why stop with a few measly trillion? Seems everyone thinks everything is free, so lets go for it? Hey, we can all get free houses, and cars and who knows what else! This is so cool!! We can live the life we always dreamed of!! I can’t wait!!
We have to pay it back? Oooops.