• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • U.N.’s Global Climate Change Plan Would Cause Economic Earthquake

    Yvo de Boer (R), Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, pictured prior to the negotiations for the climate conference in Bonn, Germany, 29 March 2009. Some 2000 delegates from all over the globe started negotiations on a new global climate treaty on Sunday. The negotiations under the roof of the United Nations are to be completed during the climate conference in Kopenhagen in December.

    While an earthquake shifts the ground beneath our feet, the United Nation’s climate change proposal would shift trillions of dollars in wealth transfers and entail “ job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes.” And while earthquakes inflict considerable amounts of economic damage, it pales in comparison to the economic burden a carbon dioxide reduction scheme would do – not only in the United States but also in other developed countries and developing countries.

    The U.N. conference in Bonn, Germany commenced yesterday to hash out details for an international approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The goal is to have a plan ready for the global warming summit in Copenhagen at the end of the year that would supplant the failed Kyoto Protocol. The 1997 agreement, which the United States chose wisely not to enter into,

    requires the 37 countries that signed it to slash emissions by a combined 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. But the treaty is a pipe dream. Instead of falling, the U.N. reported that such emissions are nearing “an all-time high.” Greenhouse gas emissions from the Kyoto signers increased 2.6 percent between 2000 and 2005.

    Signing Kyoto may allow a country to claim it’s a good “global citizen,” but many of those citizens aren’t keeping their promises. The U.N. reports Kyoto signers Austria, New Zealand and Canada have all increased their emissions over 1990 levels — by 14, 23 and 54 percent, respectively.”

    The way things are shaping up, this time would be different: “President Obama’s chief climate-change negotiator said Sunday that the United States would be ‘powerfully, fervently engaged’ in global talks to reduce carbon emissions but warned that a difficult path lay ahead.” This does not bode well for the American economy.

    Furthermore, any global treaty “would require deeper concessions from rising economic powers such as China, Brazil and India. Many researchers have concluded that China recently surpassed the United States as the world’s leading producer of greenhouse gases and that its booming industrial sector accounts for most of the world’s cumulative increase each year.”

    China, Brazil and India are rising economic powers, but that can also be read as developing nations. Political leaders of these nations are not going to de-develop their respective economies for dubious climate benefits.

    Heritage Foundation Research Fellow Derek Scissors writes that China’s chief concern is water, not carbon dioxide:

    That is not to say there is nothing important to do in the meantime. At the moment, China’s greatest ecological challenge is not air but water–which includes poor sanitation (despite rising affluence) and poses a severe long-term threat to the food supply.

    Unlike restricting carbon emissions, cleaner water does not have competitiveness implications that translate to fewer jobs. Given the intense need for water in manufacturing, better water supply–both directly in terms of water treatment and indirectly in terms of feasible industrial output–actually translates to continued competitiveness and more jobs.”

    Although a global treaty to reduce CO2 might not occur until after the economy recovers, it would be just the thing to put us back into a recession.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to U.N.’s Global Climate Change Plan Would Cause Economic Earthquake

    1. Ozzy6900, CT says:

      With all the strife and starvation that these people throw in our faces everyday, they waste their time and money on Global Warming stupidity.

      These idiots would do better getting together and having a bowel movement! If they did it in unison, we would REALLY have a Global Warming Issue!

    2. Moranosmilf, Uranus says:

      A real earthquake is not an act of God nor will you be prevented from going to Heaven if you have less than $1 million.

    3. Pingback: Global warming is a made-up crisis to justify socialism « Wintery Knight Blog

    4. Pingback: And Rightly So » Blog Archive » Tuesday Morning News & Links

    5. wendy matthews says:

      I'm so angry I do not know where to start. Perhaps with a question, what gives Obama the right to make decisions about the future of our country without the people having a role in this? Tell me how best to defeat this proposal, I will do whatever it takes.

    6. Pingback: U.N.’s global climate change plan would cause economic earthquake : Centre Flow

    7. Patrick Bell says:

      As the WSJ points out, there’s bound to be a coming cap and trade war, if President Obama is serious about imposing a “carbon tariff” on goods from India and China.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×