In the Heat of Battle, Secretary Clinton Faults Drug War Strategy
Posted March 26th, 2009 at 12.48pm in American Leadership, Protect America.
In her March 25-26 visit to Mexico, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton attracted considerable attention when she said, “Our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade. …So yes, I feel very strongly that we have a co-responsibility.”
Secretary Clinton acknowledges that the U.S. market and American habits are a major contributor to drug fight and horrific violence raging south of the border. Few will dispute this.
But the Secretary goes on to say, “we have been pursuing these [drug] strategies for 30 years.” She adds, “Neither interdiction [of drugs] nor reducing demand have been successful.”
One thinks of a general who in the heat of battle calls the troops together and announces, “Lads, we’re in heck of a fight! Let’s take that hill over yonder from the enemy [i.e. tackle the Mexican cartels] at all costs! But in all fairness I’ve got to be candid with you, I’ve a gut feeling we’ve been backing the wrong strategy for the past 30 years.”
The inspirational utility of such a message in the midst of a crisis is open to discussion.
Overall, while in Mexico City and Monterrey to demonstrate support for President Calderon and the Mexican people, buck up political will, and offer additional material support, the Secretary of State appears to be selling short the very approach - tough interdiction efforts, resolute law enforcement support, and targeting Mexico’s dangerous cartels – that she hopes will help to strengthen and stabilize Mexico.
The U.S. clearly needs a short, medium, and long-term strategy for dealing with the entire spectrum of drug issues from supply source to consumer. Demand reduction, treatment options, legal reform, decriminalization are topics of a debate we need to have in the U.S. Forging consensus on how to handle the scourge of drugs is a work in progress.
Strategic pronouncements from a foxhole in Mexico where the bullets are literally flying may not be the best way to run an anti-drug campaign.

March 26, 2009 ra,ohio writes:
Why not develop a strict policy for dealing with the situation we have with Mexico.
Hillary, and Obama are adept at demeaning this country, and in the world’s eyes they are displaying diplomatic softness.
Obama did it in Germany during his campaign.
Their arrogance, and ignorance will take a toll on our country.
They have to back it up with concrete decisions and then stick with them.
Bush W. did that and everybody knew where they stood.
The member’s of the EU are already saying that we are leaning toward socialism, and I think they are worried that we, the US is falling off the pedestal that the world put us on.
We can’t let that happen.
The world is watching US.