<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Support for Nuclear Stronger Than Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/support-for-nuclear-stronger-than-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/support-for-nuclear-stronger-than-ever/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John, Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/support-for-nuclear-stronger-than-ever/#comment-24366</link>
		<dc:creator>John, Wisconsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=4240#comment-24366</guid>
		<description>The spent fuel waste disposal solution is Yucca Mountain and all of the NIMBY excuses of Harry Reid and Obama will not change the fact that the 10 year search for Yucca Mountain arrived at the best solution. The objections of Harry Reid are not based on any science, but hear say, rumor, and speculation. Who will repay the 13 Billion the industry has paid for Yucca Mountain if it is not adopted.  
If the &quot;blue panel committee to be appointed by Secretary Chu to review the nuclear waste solution does not include Yucca Mountain as an option it will already bias its results. Secretary Chu will not get any credible results for the committee if his instructions include his exemption of Yucca Mountain, simply because Harry Reid objects. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spent fuel waste disposal solution is Yucca Mountain and all of the NIMBY excuses of Harry Reid and Obama will not change the fact that the 10 year search for Yucca Mountain arrived at the best solution. The objections of Harry Reid are not based on any science, but hear say, rumor, and speculation. Who will repay the 13 Billion the industry has paid for Yucca Mountain if it is not adopted. </p>
<p>If the &quot;blue panel committee to be appointed by Secretary Chu to review the nuclear waste solution does not include Yucca Mountain as an option it will already bias its results. Secretary Chu will not get any credible results for the committee if his instructions include his exemption of Yucca Mountain, simply because Harry Reid objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connection? -Alberta</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/support-for-nuclear-stronger-than-ever/#comment-23843</link>
		<dc:creator>Connection? -Alberta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=4240#comment-23843</guid>
		<description>59% of respondents cannot tell the Difference between a Proton,Neutron or Electron! The problem is the Waste created and the Strategy for dealing with it. When you cannot smell,taste or see something the explanation for what you plan to do to address it better be clear and based on facts! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>59% of respondents cannot tell the Difference between a Proton,Neutron or Electron! The problem is the Waste created and the Strategy for dealing with it. When you cannot smell,taste or see something the explanation for what you plan to do to address it better be clear and based on facts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA Pundits - International</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/support-for-nuclear-stronger-than-ever/#comment-23373</link>
		<dc:creator>PA Pundits - International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=4240#comment-23373</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Support For Nuclear Power Stronger Than&#160;Ever...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nick Loris.
TonyfromOz prefaces &#8230;..
This image shows what is used in the nuclear reaction that heats the water to steam to drive the turbine. These pellets have the enriched material in them. The pellets have been ceramicised and machined, and ar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Support For Nuclear Power Stronger Than&nbsp;Ever&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nick Loris.<br />
TonyfromOz prefaces &#8230;..<br />
This image shows what is used in the nuclear reaction that heats the water to steam to drive the turbine. These pellets have the enriched material in them. The pellets have been ceramicised and machined, and ar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiritof76, New Hamp</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/support-for-nuclear-stronger-than-ever/#comment-23291</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiritof76, New Hamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=4240#comment-23291</guid>
		<description>The issue about Nuclear power in this country is not based on logic but pure demagoguery. The environmental extremists do not care about anything else but to shut down nuclear power.  Even though the survey seems to indicate majority favor it, it will never get off the ground.  There are enough lawyers and other parasites to see to it that a licensed plant never gets off the ground.  For example, FPL who owns Seabrook Nuclear plant wants to construct a second plant at the same site.  The old clam shell idiots are stirring up again to mount agitation to stop it even before a license is issued. 
I just wish that the utilities simply shut down all the power plants and vow not to start them up until the government gets rid of all the parasites standing in the way of progress.  We don&#039;t have to prove the safety of nuclear power to obdurate Neanderthals. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue about Nuclear power in this country is not based on logic but pure demagoguery. The environmental extremists do not care about anything else but to shut down nuclear power.  Even though the survey seems to indicate majority favor it, it will never get off the ground.  There are enough lawyers and other parasites to see to it that a licensed plant never gets off the ground.  For example, FPL who owns Seabrook Nuclear plant wants to construct a second plant at the same site.  The old clam shell idiots are stirring up again to mount agitation to stop it even before a license is issued.</p>
<p>I just wish that the utilities simply shut down all the power plants and vow not to start them up until the government gets rid of all the parasites standing in the way of progress.  We don&#039;t have to prove the safety of nuclear power to obdurate Neanderthals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john a. power</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/support-for-nuclear-stronger-than-ever/#comment-23211</link>
		<dc:creator>john a. power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=4240#comment-23211</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to note that the use of Nuclear Power in France provides a significant (I&#039;m not sure of the exact % but I believe it is well over 50%) amount of power for electric generation. I also believe that Japan and Korea are also significant users. Most of the plants are modeled after the ones Westinghouse or GE has installed in the USA. I believe that somehow this information has not been given enough visibility in the debates over safety and somehow we should take the opportunity to do so again and again. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to note that the use of Nuclear Power in France provides a significant (I&#039;m not sure of the exact % but I believe it is well over 50%) amount of power for electric generation. I also believe that Japan and Korea are also significant users. Most of the plants are modeled after the ones Westinghouse or GE has installed in the USA. I believe that somehow this information has not been given enough visibility in the debates over safety and somehow we should take the opportunity to do so again and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

