• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • We Smell a RAT

    Testifying before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform yesterday, Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (RAT board) inspector general Earl Devaney noted: “Logic would suggest there’s going to be a loss of money to fraud and waste with this amount of money going around.” Devaney even put a number to that logic, noting that if just 7 percent of the stimulus money went to waste, that would be $55 billion. “The first time I took a pencil and figured that out, I was horrified to see it was $55 billion,” Devaney said.

    Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) was confident the government would do better this time: “[W]e’re in front of the distribution of the funds, so therefore we’re in a position to hopefully prevent a lot of the fraud and abuse that might normally come.” But how far out in front is the government really?

    True, the stimulus bill does provide $350 million for oversight, but only $84 million of that goes to the RAT board. And RAT’s biggest oversight tool is Recovery.gov, which “promises an extensive database of stimulus spending and contracts.” But as Mercatus Center fellow and StimulusWatch.org creator Jerry Brito testified later in the hearing those “transparency” efforts are completely useless:

    While the Recovery Act requires that recipients of federal stimulus funds report, to awarding agencies, how the funds are spent, there is no clear instruction that every level of subcontract or subgrant must be disclosed. The OMB Guidance interpreting the Act for agencies states that,

    Reporting requirements only apply to the prime non-Federal recipients of Federal funding, and the subawards (i.e., subgrants, subcontracts, etc.) made by these prime recipients. They do not require each subsequent subrecipient to also report. For instance, a grant could be given from the Federal government to State A, which then gives a subgrant to City B (within State A), which hires a contractor to construct a bridge, which then hires a subcontractor to supply the concrete. In this case, State A is the prime recipient, and would be required to report the subgrant to City B. However, City B does not have any specific reporting obligations, nor does the contractor or subcontractor for the purposes of reporting for the Recovery.gov website.

    This is very troubling. If we want to ensure meaningful accountability, then we must have transparency at every level of transaction. It is not enough for citizens to know that EPA made a grant to New Jersey, which in turn made a sub-grant to Newark. We also need to know that Newark made a payment to “Acme Sanitation,” which a citizen with local knowledge could recognize as a firm owned by a councilmember’s son-in-law.

    In other words, Recovery.org doesn’t offer any real transparency at all. All the Obama Administration allows citizens to do is find out which government agency awarded money to which other government entity. Citizens still have no ability to find out how government actually spent their money.

    We’re sure Devaney will do the best with the tools the Obama Administration will allow him. But so far those tools are completely inadequate for the size and scope of the task involved.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to We Smell a RAT

    1. Bob Maples, Washingt says:

      Why is not one looking at the Federal Funding Accountability Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-82, Goggle the Government bill- Coburn-Obama)?

      Seems like the new websites are waste in and of themselves. Why not fully implement existing law under the FFATA? OMB needs to fully implement subaward reporting as required by law.

    2. Spiritof76, New Hamp says:

      The big RAT can not smoke out the little rats running around stealing cheese.

      If you believe that corruption will not be in front and center in disbursing the printed money, you are either ignorant or incompetent. The whole thing is born out of corruption in the first place!

    3. JKay, Virginia says:

      No one in the media has examined the possible corrupting relationship between President Obama’s Accountabililty and Transparency Panel (RIAP) and the RAT Board. The President’s personally appointed 5 member Panel, created by the Recovery Act of 2009, “shall make recommendations to the Board on actions the Board could take to prevent fraud, waste and abuse” relating to stimulus funds.

      If you read a little further into the powers of the panel, you will see that the Panel may “accept, use, and dispose of gifts or donations of services or property”. To me, an average taxpayer, any government-formed oversight panel looking to prevent fraud and abuse should not be able to receive any gift or donation from any source. It screams of legalized bribery written into the Accountability and Transparency process.

      The American taxpayer deserves to know about the fraud, waste and abuse but it should not be filtered through a corruptible Panel that has power over Mr. Devaney and his Board.

    4. Barb -mn says:

      Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) was confident the government would do better this time: GIVE ME A BREAK. We aren't here to afford incompetence, mismanagement, inefficient make-work jobs, inequality, exceptions and social programs. The only thing this government can do better is wiping their butts with their corruption and indoctrination.

      Whose job is it to arrest those committing treason?

      IT'S TIME!!!!!!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×