• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The First Shot of an Obama Trade War?

    Last week, with the signing of his pen on the Omnibus Spending Bill, President Barack Obama ended a pilot program designed to allow Mexican trucking companies to ship goods deep inside the United States.  While controversial with some quarters of the American public, the program was necessary to ensure U.S. compliance with the North American Free Trade Agreement, commonly known as NAFTA.

    With the program no longer funded, the United States would be willingly violating that trade treaty.  As a result, the government of Mexico announced plans to retaliate against the U.S. by raising entry tariffs on 90 products imported to Mexico from the United States with an annual worth of at $2.4 Billion. The Houston Chronicle reports:

    “These are what are commonly known as reprisal measures,” Mexican Economy Secretary Gerardo Ruiz said in announcing the tariffs. “The reprisals are the cost the United States will have to pay.”

    If carried out, the Mexican retaliation would be the first of its kind since the signing of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, which has erased most commercial barriers among the United States, Mexico and Canada.

    Mexico has yet to publish the list of effected products.  Only stating at the moment it will include a mix of agricultural and industrial products produced in some 40 states.  The full list is expected to published near the end of the week.

    The issue of Mexican Trucking under NAFTA has long been a contentious one since NAFTA’s inception.  The dispute between the two nations reached a previous high watermark when Mexico took the United States to the five-member NAFTA Arbitration board in 2001 over the issue.  The Mexicans won with the board saying the U.S. was in non-compliance.

    The Obama Administration has stated publicly they will work on replacing the program, but no one knows where Congress stands on recreating the program. Financial Times reports:

    The pilot programme has been opposed by many lawmakers and by the Teamsters Union, which says that Mexican trucks are unsafe. Because they are largely restricted to short-run hops over the border, most Mexican trucks entering the US are run by so-called “drayage” operations that use older vehicles more likely to fail inspection tests. But a study funded by the US Department of Transportation found that when comparing like with like, Mexican trucks were often safer than their US counterparts.

    “The Mexicans have been extraordinarily patient on this,” said Edward Alden, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. “The pilot project was enough to give them glimmerings of hope for a long time.”

    Heritage fellow James Roberts also wants to see an expansion of the program:

    The U.S. and Mexican economies are deeply intertwined, and both are facing problems. Increasing efficiency in trade between the two countries will benefit both sides and strengthen the pro-market-based democratic approach of Mexican President Felipe Calderon. Improved safety of both the U.S. and Mexican long-haul truck fleet will also contribute to improved national security in both countries.

    Congress, President Obama, and his new transportation secretary, Ray LaHood, should reject calls by protectionists to end the cross-border trucking program and, instead, take immediate steps to expand it and make it permanent.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to The First Shot of an Obama Trade War?

    1. tropicgirl, palm bea says:

      What part about "PILOT PROGRAM" AND "TEST PROGRAM" AND "TEMPORARY PROGRAM" do the lawless in Mexico, and the lawless in the US, not understand?

      Everyone is cheating, lying-to and abusing the American public and the American worker, even Obama.

      Is he ever going to grow some? This is one area where the left and right populists agree. No European country would tolerate the ruination of their borders and out-of-control slave and drug trafficking across it. But the American public is supposed to take whatever crap they want us to. I say no more. Open borders and NAFTA is dangerous to America's physical, employment and financial health. Again, please grow some Obama instead of being a corporate-lover.

    2. Franklin's Lock says:

      First, this is only appeasing unions and has nothing to do with safety.

      Next, it is the Great Depression all over again. As the depression began, the U.S. raised tariffs and started a trade war with Europe and Canada. During the trade war, Canada’s government collapsed as their economy went into turmoil.

      So, Obama violates a treaty with the third largest economic trade partner and starts a trade way while the world’s economy is in turmoil. Mexico is teetering on chaos. This trade war can not be good for the people of Mexico and their stability. Especially with armed drug cartels killing Mexicans and Americans along the border.

      Amazing, how history repeats itself.

      http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/

    3. Porter M. Corn - Mon says:

      When you have been lied to once, why do people continue to believe the one who has issues with telling the truth?

      Jim Hoffa continues to rant about those unsafe, unregulated trucks from Mexico, while ignoring the truth and trying to hide it from the American public.

      In the recent DOT OIG Final Report, (http://www.oig.dot.gov/StreamFile?file=/data/pdfdocs/NAFTA_final_report_signed.pdf ) The Inspector General, a neutral investigative arm of the Congress, found that those "dangerous, unsafe" Mexican trucks actually had a better safety record than US trucks across all types of operations.

      The report showed these trucks to be in complete compliance with our rules and regs.

      Hoffa, and Todd Spencer of OOIDA continue to deliberately lie to the American people and expect us to buy into it

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×