• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Who is Holding the GAO Accountable?

    The USA Today cites an independent report that questions the effectiveness of the ground-based missile defense interceptors the United States plans to deploy in Europe to counter a potential long-range Iranian nuclear-tipped ballistic missile threat. The report comes from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), an auditing and investigative arm of the Congress.

    While GAO reports may be “independent,” that does not mean they provide a fair and credible assessment of Pentagon programs. Last week, Army leaders held a press conference after a GAO report claimed to have identified a $21 billion overrun in one of their programs. According to one press report: Lt. Gen N. Ross Thompson III, military deputy assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology, sounded flabbergasted with GAO’s estimate. “I don’t know where they came up with the figure,” he said. “I don’t know where it came from.” Thompson added that he “liked data and facts” as much anyone, but said he gets frustrated when what he views as unsupported data becomes reported as truth.

    The recent GAO report criticizing missile defense raises similar questions about the efficacy of GAO defense acquisition studies. For example, according to press reports the study says that US missile defenses, “have not demonstrated an ability to detect decoys.” This criticism makes little sense.

    First, Iran has not yet developed a ballistic warhead decoy system. So it is not critical right now that the United States has a counter to something that does not yet exist. Indeed, the purpose of building interceptor defenses is to de-value the importance of ballistic missiles to Iran—and hopefully dissuade them from aggressively pursuing further developments.

    Second, the current missile defense program has plans to conduct tests and develop countermeasures for “decoys” if it looks like the Iranians or North Koreans might potentially deploy them.

    The “decoy” issue and other critical questions about missile defense are addressed in 33 Minutes a companion reader to the documentary film.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Who is Holding the GAO Accountable?

    1. Barb -mn says:

      Boy, the obama administration is nothing this country needs. They obviously want any harm to come to us as their only defense is pointing fingers anywhere but at their own negligence or knowledge of their duty. For the safety of this country, our military, these people must be removed!

    2. Spiritof76, New Hamp says:

      Where is the GAO report on the culpability of certain members of Congress in the Fannie and Freddie debacle? Now, there is a big fraud on the American people.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×