• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • We've Heard This Rhetoric on Defense Spending Before

    President Barack Obama

    In his February 24, Address to Joint Session of Congress, President Barack Obama promised to “reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use.” In the DC Examiner, Heritage senior fellow James Carafano wonders that means:

    All the “Cold War” weapons still in the Pentagon’s inventory—tanks, planes, ships—are already bought and paid for. And they are still in use—from aircraft carriers to cruise missiles. Scrap them, and you’ll have to replace them.

    Every system that we are buying now or plan to buy has been justified over the last 20 years by Democratic and Republican presidents and funded by Democratic and Republican Congresses based on “future requirements” not refighting the last war.

    Missile defense is a case in point. We didn’t start building defenses until after the Cold War ended, and we built it not to counter the Soviet threat but deal with new missile powers like North Korea and Iran.

    If the president chooses to scrap all or any of this, there will be little or nothing to replace it. It takes years to get a new program up and running. Many troops entering the military now will be retired before they see any of the future equipment this administration proposes.

    This is not the first time we’ve heard rhetoric like this from the White House:

    Once upon a time, there was a president who promised to spend less on defense and give us more. And he did—in a manner of speaking.

    The president was Jimmy Carter. America’s tragedy in Vietnam had ended. The military was worn out after almost a decade of war. Congress had “financed” combat operations largely by deferring the purchase of new weapons, deferring maintenance, and otherwise cutting corners–paring bases in NATO countries, reducing troops on Korea’s DMZ, etc.

    But when Carter came to the White Houses in 1977, rather than simply invest in rebuilding America’s military, he promised America one better. He endorsed Defense Secretary Harold Brown’s “offset” strategy.

    America did get more for less—just as the president promised. But, the “more” was just a lot more risk. No matter what fancy strategy or cost-savings a president promises, under-funding the military hollows out the force, leaving it with not enough to maintain trained and ready troops, pay for current operations, and prepare for the future. That’s what happened under Carter. All this became all too clear when the Army Chief of Staff General “Shy” Meyer testified before Congress that he had 16 divisions on paper—only four of them were ready go to combat.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to We've Heard This Rhetoric on Defense Spending Before

    1. Franklin's Lock says:

      This kind of strategy will embolden our enemies. They will see us cutting our budget and programs and take advantage this, as Iran and U.S.S.R did in the 70s. This is just giving them the green light to push Obama around and put us at risk.


    2. Barb -mn says:


    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.