<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-Verify Lives Another Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/12/e-verify-lives-another-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/12/e-verify-lives-another-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Jay Carafano</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/12/e-verify-lives-another-day/#comment-21647</link>
		<dc:creator>James Jay Carafano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=3702#comment-21647</guid>
		<description>I think it is important that we make E-Verify available to folks and that we make the system as effective as possible. 
 
There is no plan to make it a &quot;mandatory&quot; system for all employers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is important that we make E-Verify available to folks and that we make the system as effective as possible.</p>
<p>There is no plan to make it a &quot;mandatory&quot; system for all employers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/12/e-verify-lives-another-day/#comment-21504</link>
		<dc:creator>JMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=3702#comment-21504</guid>
		<description>For the sake of argument Pete S., I&#039;ll for now take you at your word in your comments but I submit the following: 
 
I currently do NOT own a business, HOWEVER, I may in the future &amp; if E-Verify is NOT available I just will REFUSE to hire ANYBODY I even suspect A LITTLE (like NOT having an accent of a USA citizen...i.e. Irish accent [YES, there are over 50K ILLEGAL ALIENS that are Irish in the USA], Hispanic accent, Asian accent etc) of being here illegally &amp; as long as I don&#039;t admit it to anybody I&#039;ll get away w/ it...&amp; trust me there ARE employers that will do just that so instead of the ppl who fall into the 1/2 of 1% (.5%) error rate not getting jobs when they are eligible there will be a Hell of a lot more. 
 
BTW, if your account is true...do you know WHY the error occurred? Did your friend submit the wrong info (aka a &#039;typo&#039;)? If the false rejection was b/c of HIS error...then maybe he should be sued but if the error was the woman&#039;s (like she mis-wrote the info) then she ought to STHU. 
 
And REMEMBER, this is about making E-Verify available NOT REQUIRED FEDERALLY. If it is NOT re-authorized then employers will NOT even have the option available. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the sake of argument Pete S., I&#039;ll for now take you at your word in your comments but I submit the following:</p>
<p>I currently do NOT own a business, HOWEVER, I may in the future &amp; if E-Verify is NOT available I just will REFUSE to hire ANYBODY I even suspect A LITTLE (like NOT having an accent of a USA citizen&#8230;i.e. Irish accent [YES, there are over 50K ILLEGAL ALIENS that are Irish in the USA], Hispanic accent, Asian accent etc) of being here illegally &amp; as long as I don&#039;t admit it to anybody I&#039;ll get away w/ it&#8230;&amp; trust me there ARE employers that will do just that so instead of the ppl who fall into the 1/2 of 1% (.5%) error rate not getting jobs when they are eligible there will be a Hell of a lot more.</p>
<p>BTW, if your account is true&#8230;do you know WHY the error occurred? Did your friend submit the wrong info (aka a &#039;typo&#039;)? If the false rejection was b/c of HIS error&#8230;then maybe he should be sued but if the error was the woman&#039;s (like she mis-wrote the info) then she ought to STHU.</p>
<p>And REMEMBER, this is about making E-Verify available NOT REQUIRED FEDERALLY. If it is NOT re-authorized then employers will NOT even have the option available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric, St. Louis</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/12/e-verify-lives-another-day/#comment-21502</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric, St. Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=3702#comment-21502</guid>
		<description>@Pete: Sounds like your friend messed up - from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uscis.gov/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=d6f988e60a405110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=d6f988e60a405110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.uscis.gov/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.j...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
# E-Verify must be used only after hire and after completion of the Form I-9. Employers may not pre-screen applicants through E-Verify. 
 
# The employee must be given eight federal government work days to contact the appropriate federal agency to contest the information mismatch. 
 
Sounds like your friend was basically trapped by the E-verify system - by signing up, he basically gave away his ability to quick-hire people. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pete: Sounds like your friend messed up &#8211; from <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=d6f988e60a405110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=d6f988e60a405110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD" rel="nofollow">http://www.uscis.gov/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.j&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p># E-Verify must be used only after hire and after completion of the Form I-9. Employers may not pre-screen applicants through E-Verify.</p>
<p># The employee must be given eight federal government work days to contact the appropriate federal agency to contest the information mismatch.</p>
<p>Sounds like your friend was basically trapped by the E-verify system &#8211; by signing up, he basically gave away his ability to quick-hire people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete S.</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/12/e-verify-lives-another-day/#comment-21499</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=3702#comment-21499</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine denied a lady employment because E-Verify could not verify her.  It ended up that she was ok, but since he needed someone right away, he gave the position to another person.  She now has lawyers and is trying to sue him for $500K.  Uh-oh. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine denied a lady employment because E-Verify could not verify her.  It ended up that she was ok, but since he needed someone right away, he gave the position to another person.  She now has lawyers and is trying to sue him for $500K.  Uh-oh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMT, Midest, USA</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/12/e-verify-lives-another-day/#comment-21484</link>
		<dc:creator>JMT, Midest, USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=3702#comment-21484</guid>
		<description>Making it PERMANENT would be the RIGHT thing to do &amp; then &quot;reauthorization&quot; would NOT be needed! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making it PERMANENT would be the RIGHT thing to do &amp; then &quot;reauthorization&quot; would NOT be needed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aedyn, Dayton Ohio</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/12/e-verify-lives-another-day/#comment-21479</link>
		<dc:creator>Aedyn, Dayton Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=3702#comment-21479</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m tired of this government doing everything they can to undermine the freedoms our forefathers sought to guarantee for us. 
 
We have to take back our country... preferably by peaceful means but if need be by force. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m tired of this government doing everything they can to undermine the freedoms our forefathers sought to guarantee for us.</p>
<p>We have to take back our country&#8230; preferably by peaceful means but if need be by force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

