• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Advice to President Barack Obama on Judicial Nominees

    Former Attorney General Ed Meese hosted a panel to give President Barack Obama advice when on choosing his nominations for the the Supreme and Appellate courts. On the panel were Walter Dellinger, Stuart Taylor, and Jonathan Adler.

    Dellinger had a bevy of advice. First, he advised Obama to select someone who is humble. He said that opinions would be far more persuasive if they were honest, weighing both sides equally and walking us through the decision making process that lead them to whatever decision they made. He also said that Obama should pick judges that play well with others. If Justices can get other judges to be more bipartisan, it could help guide the Supreme Court as well as lower courts in future decisions.

    Dellinger also stated that diversity is good, but Obama must understand the limits of it. He used the example of Roman-Catholic Judges. Once the third Roman-Catholic is appointed, it is no longer a story. There will always be a “Roman-Catholic seat” from then on. He also said that President Obama can look outside of the judicial world for qualified candidates. Justices do not necessarily have to be judges. Dellinger would nominate Lee Hamilton if he was nominating people. Dellinger wanted to hear a healthy debate on whether or not it is better to have Intellectuals or Practitioners on the Appellate Courts. Lastly, Dellinger stated that he should look for experience rather than someone who is trying to shape the future. He noted that there is a certain type of growth that stops when you are appointed to the bench.

    Stuart Taylor echoed the need to nominate judges that had humility. Taylor also suggested that Obama appoint justices that were moderate. Not too far to the left, not too far to the right. He also noted that it will be difficult for Obama to reconcile campaign rhetoric (saying that he will appoint liberal judges) with votes and stances that he has taken. For example, he voted for controversial amendments to the Patriot Act, as well as wiretapping and a national fingerprint registry. A nominee that supports these initiatives will alienate his base, but a nominee that opposes these initiatives will erode his national security policies. (Dellinger disagreed with the notion that Obama had to support his base because he will never have a contested Democratic primary again).

    Jonathan Adler was the last to speak. He commented that Obama will have power to shape the Court, but he will have much greater power to shape the appellate courts. He cited a Brookings study that found that Obama will be able to nominate 1/3 of the Appellate Court judges in his first term. Presidents usually appoint that many in two terms. Adler echoed humility, but also stressed the need to vet nominees. Renominating Bush appointees should also not be off the table. He weighed in on the question that Dellinger asked (whether or not it was better to have intellectuals or practitioners on the Appellate) saying it was better to have intellectuals on the Appellate. (He also applauded Mr. Meese and Reagan for making a conscience effort to get intellectuals like Bork on the Appellate).

    The advice to the Senators confirming the Judges was to hang a big sign on the back wall that says: IT IS NOT ABOUT YOU!

    Here is the video of the event

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Advice to President Barack Obama on Judicial Nominees

    1. Lynn B. DeSpain says:

      Someone actually suggested that a Judge be Honest? Really?

      Another suggested that they play well with other? What about between breacks, like when actual work is being done?

      Then there was the debate over experience and intellect. How about Common Sense and the Consitution?

      My recommendations would be as follows;

      Pick people who are not Lawers, nor have a degree in Law, but can read and understand for themselves without interpreters.

      Pick people who believe in the Constitution, and that it is not a 'Living Document'.

      Pick people who have actually physically worked for a living, at least part of their lives.

      Pick people who can admit when they are wrong, and are quick to correct it.

      Pick peole who pay their taxes.

      Pick people who do not hire Illegals.

      Pick peole who are not afraid to say,"This is wrong" or "This is stupid."

      Pick people though theri family may have lived on Welfare, they did not!

      Pick people who paid their debts in full, including student loans.

      Pick people who have had the Honor of serving our Nation in the Military, Officer, or enlisted.

      Pick someone who has a sense of humor, who can laugh at him or herself, tell a good joke, and doesn't take themselves too seriously.

      Pick a person who knows that there is more to life than work.


    2. Duvall, WA says:

      Pick originalists, not activists.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.