• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Restoring Welfare Reform

    Congressmen Tom Price (R-GA) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) should be commended for introducing a bill this week that will eliminate a little noted provision passed in the stimulus bill which severely undermines the success of the historic 1996 welfare reform law.

    H.R. 1277, the Welfare Reform Restoration Act, repeals Section 2101 of the stimulus bill which creates a new $5 billion program that encourages and rewards states for increasing the size of their caseloads. The stimulus bill reverts welfare back to the broken system it once was that trapped a growing number of families into a lifetime of dependency on government assistance. Welfare reform was heavily bipartisan and many of the democrats and republicans who voted for it originally in 1996 are still in Congress today.

    The old system, known as the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), tied funding levels to the size of the caseload – the larger the caseload, the more money a state would receive and if caseloads shrunk, a state would be penalized and receive less money. It is not surprising that welfare caseloads grew at an alarming rate due to this system.

    The 1996 welfare reform law eliminated this perverse financial incentive by giving each state a flat funding level that did not vary whether the state increased or decreased its caseload. In addition, states were given the goal of reducing welfare dependence. They were rewarded by allowing them to keep the extra funds once recipients left the rolls and moved into employment – not to mention the satisfaction of knowing they helped transform lives by moving them from poverty into gainful employment and stability.

    The stimulus bill overturned the fiscal foundation of welfare reform by restoring an AFDC-style funding system. For the first time since 1996, the federal government will begin paying states bonuses to increase their welfare caseloads. Indeed, the new welfare system created by the stimulus bill is actually worse than the old AFDC program because it rewards the states more heavily to increase their caseloads. Under the stimulus bill, the federal government will pay 80 percent of cost for each new family that a state enrolls in welfare; this matching rate is far higher than it was under AFDC.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Restoring Welfare Reform

    1. Augustine 25 says:

      This was one of the most depressing aspects of the stimulus package. I'm glad Congressmen Tom Price (R-GA) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) are taking action on this crucial issue. Without this sort of effort, welfare is guaranteed to harm another generation of the most vulnerable Americans.

    2. Barb -mn says:

      How about removal of government paid welfare altogether? In America, under freedom, people are responsible for their own personal/individual welfare. We continue to be taken advantage of as the government continues to weaken the majority by indoctrinated thinking it's the government's responsibility to dictate the taxpayers unfair, unlimited, forced expenses provide for whatever the majority won't do for themselves or the children they bring into the world.

      Many in this state net more then we, yet they receive food subsidies, free breakfast and lunch at schools, less cost to housing, free tuition, free medical, free dental, free extracurriculars. And frequent the foodshelves. While all of this comes out of our pocket for ourselves and them.

      Just recently there was an article in the local paper about citizens saying they pay a licensing fee for hunting but they want more tax money going into increased population of SQUIRRELS! It would be appropriate to raise the hunting fees as this is a benefit to some and not all.

      This state gives away more money unfairly, inequitably, and preferentially. Because of all of this we'll eventually be forced on the government dole!


    3. Heather says:

      The reality is that our society creates poverty and inequality. Until we are willing to acknowledge class privilege and what mechanisms promote and further the oppression of the lower the class, we should continue to subsidize for the lack of equality that the below attitudes promote. Not to mention I don't see anyone complaining about the tax breaks and incentives given to the richest 10% of the country. Is that not welfare?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.