• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Calls For Obama to Examine Nuclear Waste Alternative is Step in Right Direction

    According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, the Nuclear Energy Institute is calling on the Obama Administration to create a blue-ribbon commission to look at alternatives to the nation’s current approach to nuclear waste management.

    While blue-ribbon commissions are often excuses for doing nothing, a commission in this case has substantial merit.

    Nuclear energy is critical to meeting the nation’s economic, environmental, and energy objectives. Despite being affordable, safe, abundant and environmentally clean, significant obstacles stand in the way of a broad expansion of U.S. nuclear power. Central among them is overcoming questions regarding nuclear waste.

    In reality, dealing with nuclear waste is not a problem. America’s nuclear operators safely and effectively manage the waste of their 104 operating reactors everyday. Problems crop up when trying to develop longer-term, more permanent solutions. But even this is a political problem, not a technical one.


    Developing a long-term strategy to manage America’s nuclear waste has always been important, but today it is critical. The U.S. is standing at the threshold of a nuclear renaissance that could transform how the nation generates energy. But for this to happen, the nation must come up with a workable solution for nuclear waste management.

    This recognition has generated a lot of new ideas for reform in the past year.

    The Nuclear Energy Institute developed a comprehensive strategy that includes interim storage, reprocessing, and long-term storage. Another idea brought forth includes creating a so-called “quasi-government entity” to manage the nation’s nuclear waste. And Heritage developed a plan to transfer responsibility for nuclear waste management to the private sector. Others have ideas floating around as well.

    The point is that there are a lot of good ideas out there on how to reform nuclear waste management. And because there is growing appreciation for the fact that the nation needs to develop a better approach there might actually be an opportunity to bring about some change.

    While a blue ribbon commission would have to be structured properly, have the right participants, and be charged with an appropriate mission, it could be the right vehicle to assess all of these ideas, come up with some new ones, and develop a set of recommendations that could put the country on a clear path towards a sustainable nuclear renaissance.

     Jack Spencer, Heritage Research Fellow in Nuclear Energy, authored this post.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Calls For Obama to Examine Nuclear Waste Alternative is Step in Right Direction

    1. Keith, Richland, WA says:

      You think the NEI would have just been advocating for straight vitrification of waste materials. It's completely safe for storage, lacks contamination threats, and is the best method developed in decades.

      That's what they're building at Hanford, WA right now to clean up leftover waste from Manhattan.

    2. Tim says:

      These are all nice sentiments but the reality is those who now control our government have shown no intention of do anything that would serve the interests of American citizens. They're are just too busy serving themselves at our expense. Basically the won the American citizens did not.

    3. Robert Jones Lancast says:

      Nuclear energy is the safest way for the U.S. to go into the 21st century . As long as politicans try to run everything the country is never going to advance enough to have the energy that we need . The politicians in Washington have no intentions of serving the people , but every thing they can to stay in power . Nuclear waste can be taken care easily enough , but we have to have a Gov. that is willing to make hard desisions

      about how to go about it , not what is political


    4. David Watts, Solvang says:

      It is interesting that nuclear energy deniers take no interest in the most difficult nuclear waste; that produced by nuclear medicine. Have you ever heard one talk about shutting down radiation therapy or X-Ray machines? The French have been re-using spent nuclear fuel for years.

      Why can't we?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.