• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Avoiding a "Savior-Based" Economy

    South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford made some very important, insightful points on Sunday. He said them very concisely, as politicians know how to do. They are just what we’ve been saying here for so many weeks and months, and are important points that every American must remember:

    • “A problem that was created by building up of too much debt will not be solved with yet more debt.”
    • “We’re moving precipitously close to what I would call a savior-based economy…what you see in Russia or Venezuela or Zimbabwe or places like that where it matters not how good your product is to the consumer but what your political connection is to those in power.”
    • “That is quite different than a market-based economy where some rise and some fall but there’s a consequence to making a stupid decision.”
    • “A lot of people who’ve made some very stupid decisions are being bailed out by the population at large.”
    • “We’re going to go through a process of deleveraging…And it will be painful. The question is: Do we apply a bunch of different band aids that lengthen and prolong this pain or do we take the band aid off? I believe very strongly: let’s get this thing over with, let’s not drag it on.”

    Wonderful. We agree entirely. However, he also inadvertently made another thing very clear. Although Sanford was critical of the federal government’s efforts to get the economy back on track, he equivocated when asked whether he would turn down money in the stimulus package intended for South Carolina which he would control.

    “I think that ultimately we’ll decide that question when we get to it,” the governor said.

    Let us remember this even more: there is a reason that our Senators, Congressmen and Governors do not admit the above truths about the so-called stimulus package, and the bail-outs, and the other spending plans, more often. It isn’t because the arguments aren’t true, and it isn’t because politicians are stupid. It is simply in their own self-interest to go along with such spending. Whatever their true ideology, the chatter heard in the media about this plan is mostly between various recipients of the money or the power to control the money. No wonder there are so few dissenting voices, despite the 70% who are skeptical among the regular public. Kudos to the American public for maintaining skepticism in the face of all the hype

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Avoiding a "Savior-Based" Economy

    1. anonymous, anywhere says:

      Mark Sanford's South Carolina unemployment rate IS the HIGHEST LEVEL ON RECORD

      December 2008 SC Unemployment Rates

      SC Unemployment Rate is 9.5% in December

      With momentum from ongoing layoffs and an expanding labor force, South Carolina's unemployment rate continued to climb in December reaching 9.5%, the State Employment Security Commission reported today. This is more than a full percentage point above November's rate of 8.4%, and the highest rate since January 1983. The state's labor force grew nearly 14,300 in December to 2,184,613. The number of unemployed grew almost 25,600 to 207,171, the highest level on record. The national unemployment rate also rose sharply, climbing from 6.7% in November to 7.2% in December.

      Unemployment Rates Ranked By County (unadjusted)

      Rank – County – December 2008

      1 Allendale 19.7%

      2 Marion 19.0

      3 Chester 17.3

      4 Marlboro 16.9

      5 Barnwell 15.8

      6 Bamberg 15.8

      7 Union 14.7

      8 Dillon 14.2

      McCormick 14.2

      Williamsburg 14.2

      11 Fairfield 14.1

      12 Lancaster 13.9

      13 Orangeburg 13.6

      14 Cherokee 13.2

      15 Chesterfield 13.1

      16 Hampton 12.7

      17 Clarendon 12.6

      18 Lee 12.2

      19 Colleton 11.8

      Georgetown 11.8

      21 Darlington 11.7

      22 Horry 11.5

      23 Abbeville 11.4

      24 Greenwood 11.2

      25 Oconee 10.9

      26 Sumter 10.7

      27 Calhoun 10.1

      28 York 9.9

      29 Newberry 9.7

      30 Anderson 9.6

      31 Spartanburg 9.4

      32 Laurens 9.3

      33 Florence 9.1

      34 Edgefield 8.4

      Kershaw 8.4

      36 Berkeley 8.2

      37 Jasper 8.1

      38 Pickens 8.0

      39 Dorchester 7.9

      40 Richland 7.8

      41 Aiken 7.7

      42 Greenville 7.6

      43 Saluda 7.5

      44 Beaufort 7.0

      45 Charleston 6.9

      46 Lexington 6.5


    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.