• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • AP Catching On: Nothing Temporary About This Spending

    Then Senator Barack Obama speaks to an NEA Representative Assembly in Philadelphia, July 2007

    Last summer, National Economic Council director Larry Summers said that in order to be effective, any stimulus bill “must be clearly and credibly temporary.More and more people are beginning to notice that President Barack Obama’s trillion dollar spending plan completely fails that test. The Associated Press reports today:

    If the government spends billions on education to help jump-start the staggering economy, what happens when things improve and schools have grown used to the largesse?

    The measure making its way through Congress would achieve a long-sought goal of Obama and other Democrats. For the first time, it would fully fund No Child Left Behind, former President George W. Bush’s education program.

    “These are political goals,” said Checker Finn, president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a Washington think tank. “In other words, other fish are being fried here.”

    [The plan] would also pump an extra $26 billion into two long-term programs, No Child Left Behind and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The bill includes a $15 billion bonus fund to encourage reforms related to teaching and student tests.

    Even those who asked for the money acknowledge it will be difficult to cut later.

    Terry Hartle, lobbyist for the American Council on Education, the leading higher education group in Washington, called it “the tail problem,” for spending that stretches far beyond the short term stimulus package.

    And then there is this nugget:

    School districts do spend a lot of the No Child Left Behind and special education money on teacher salaries. But they have five years to spend money from the two programs — and a long track record of spending it slowly.

    There currently is more than $5 billion in unspent federal education money, according to the Education Department. In other words, schools and states are still sitting on the money, McKeon said.

    In other words, not only is there nothing temporary about this new spending, but states can’t even spend the money they are being spent now fast enough. Which means all this new education spending is not timely either.

    Posted in Education, Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to AP Catching On: Nothing Temporary About This Spending

    1. Ozzy6900, CT (The Bl says:

      I have come to the conclusion that if the Left gets all of the stimulus packages the way that they want, we can say goodby to the Republic and hello to the USSA (Union of Socialist States of America). Welcome, Commrad!

    2. okcentr says:

      ????????? ????!

    3. ?? ???????? ??????, ?? ?? ???????, ??? ??? ??????.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.