<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deficit Spending Stimulus Skeptics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another punch to the gut of Keynesian economic &#8220;stimulus&#8221; &#124; RedState</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-242845</link>
		<dc:creator>Another punch to the gut of Keynesian economic &#8220;stimulus&#8221; &#124; RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-242845</guid>
		<description>[...] multiplier, a point often omitted from these discussions is the long-term cost to the economy of deficit spending.  The Romer study found a dramatically negative effect from tax increases (up to 3% GDP decline [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] multiplier, a point often omitted from these discussions is the long-term cost to the economy of deficit spending.  The Romer study found a dramatically negative effect from tax increases (up to 3% GDP decline [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Gray, Scottsda</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-208363</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Gray, Scottsda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-208363</guid>
		<description>Do Conservatives Have Smaller Brains? 
 
 
Some people&#8217;s brains are better suited to introspection than others - 
 
A specific region of the brain appears to be larger in individuals who are good at turning their thoughts inward and reflecting upon their decisions, according to new research published in the journal Science. This act of introspection -- or &quot;thinking about your thinking&quot; -- is a key aspect of human consciousness, though scientists have noted plenty of variation in peoples&#039; abilities to introspect.1 
 
Neuroscientist Stephen Fleming and a team of UK researchers have found that people with more gray and white matter microstructures in a particular area of the prefrontal cortex tended to be more introspective, which is to say, better at evaluating their own performance. 
 
Conservatives are generally not introspective.  
 
They tend to have difficulty admitting when they make mistakes, they seem oblivious to their own behavior, and the consequences of it, and tend to blame others. 
 
Case and point: The enormous debt the US is struggling with now was created when the Conservatives were in control of the Congress and the White House. Yet they cannot admit this, and instead, blame the new Congress and White House. 
 
There is widespread agreement that the current economic crisis has been brought about by poor leadership and greed. 
 
In a recent Globe &amp; Mail newspaper article, Professor Henry Mintzberg, of McGill University in Montreal, suggests that much of the blame for economic failure can be tied directly to the failure of management education. Professor Mintzberg goes on to point out that lack of introspection in corporate America prevents leaders from learning from their own mistakes.2 
 
To this day former President George W Bush has never admitted he did anything wrong. 
 
Was his failure as a leader due to having a smaller prefrontal cortex that blocked 
him from being introspective? 
 
Quick to anger -  
 
The ventral area of the prefrontal cortex is known to be crucial for constraining impulsive outbursts. Persons with a predisposition to anger and aggression have been found to have decreased activity in this brain area. 
 
In August of 2004, Darin Dougherty, M.D., an assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, submitted a study, reported in the Vol. 61 No. 8, of the Archives of General Psychiatry.3 
 
In this study, when the subjects started getting angry, blood flow increases in the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex were significantly greater in the healthy control subjects than in the subjects who were prone to anger. 
 
Attaching emotional content to logistical situations is a behavior that is often exhibited by Conservatives. 
 
If you watch Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity, or Ann Coulter, you will see that they repeatedly attach emotional content to logistical behavior. And, the emotion they attach most often is anger. 
 
Do these people have decreased brain activity? 
Is the blood just not flowing to their brains? 
 
Impaired ability - 
 
Since the 1980s, scientists have correlated damage to the prefrontal cortex with psychopathic behavior and the inability to make morally and socially acceptable decisions.  
 
Researchers at the University of Sweden have found the prefrontal cortex to be precisely the area of the brain that is impaired in murderers, rapists, and other violent criminals who repeatedly re-offend. At the November 1999 annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Asa Bergvall and her colleagues presented findings on their study of violent offenders.4 
 
The brains of the violent offenders performed normally in every task except the one, which taps prefrontal function, &quot;In that,&#8221; says Bergvall, &#8220;It was as if they were retarded.&quot;  
 
They had an impaired ability to shift their attention in order to view the world in a different way &#8211; a function linked to the lateral prefrontal cortex.  
 
Former president George W Bush was often called retarded, because of his impaired ability to shift his view of the world. 
 
But he was no violent criminal. 
 
Neurology professor Dr. Antonio Damasio and colleagues at the University of Iowa College of Medicine reported on two cases of early brain damage to the prefrontal cortex. As adults, both patients showed an almost total lack of guilt.5 
?University of Southern California psychopathologist Adrian Raine has documented prefrontal damage in people with Antisocial Personality Disorder, which is characterized by irresponsibility and deceitfulness, lack of emotional depth and remorse.6 
 
His article in the Archives of General Psychiatry, February 1, 2000 stated that, &#8220;The antisocial men actually had 11-14% less brain tissue volume in their prefrontal cortexes, compared to normal males &#8211; a deficit of about two teaspoons&#039; worth.&quot;  
 
What if George W. Bush has 5-6% less brain tissue volume in his prefrontal cortexes? 
Not enough to make him a violent criminal, but just enough to block introspection. 
 
His presidency was certainly characterized by irresponsibility, deceitfulness, and lack of  remorse. 
 
Was this because he was one teaspoon short of a full brain? 
 
The chicken or the egg - 
 
Conservatives are called Conservatives because they share similar beliefs. 
Consequently, they exhibit similar behaviors. 
Are their beliefs and behaviors similar because they lack the ability for introspection? 
 
Do people become Conservatives because they have smaller prefrontal cortexes? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 -  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100916145047.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/1009...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
2  - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/article719382.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
3  - &lt;a href=&quot;http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/61/8/795&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/61/...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
4 -  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fi.edu/learn/brain/head.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fi.edu/learn/brain/head.html&lt;/a&gt;  
 
5  - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crimetimes.org/00a/w00ap4.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.crimetimes.org/00a/w00ap4.htm&lt;/a&gt;  
 
6 - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833485?ordinalpos=1&amp;itool=PPMCLayout.PPMCAppController.PPMCArticlePage.PPMCPubmedRA&amp;linkpos=4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833485?ordin...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do Conservatives Have Smaller Brains?</p>
<p>Some people&rsquo;s brains are better suited to introspection than others -</p>
<p>A specific region of the brain appears to be larger in individuals who are good at turning their thoughts inward and reflecting upon their decisions, according to new research published in the journal Science. This act of introspection &#8212; or &quot;thinking about your thinking&quot; &#8212; is a key aspect of human consciousness, though scientists have noted plenty of variation in peoples&#039; abilities to introspect.1</p>
<p>Neuroscientist Stephen Fleming and a team of UK researchers have found that people with more gray and white matter microstructures in a particular area of the prefrontal cortex tended to be more introspective, which is to say, better at evaluating their own performance.</p>
<p>Conservatives are generally not introspective. </p>
<p>They tend to have difficulty admitting when they make mistakes, they seem oblivious to their own behavior, and the consequences of it, and tend to blame others.</p>
<p>Case and point: The enormous debt the US is struggling with now was created when the Conservatives were in control of the Congress and the White House. Yet they cannot admit this, and instead, blame the new Congress and White House.</p>
<p>There is widespread agreement that the current economic crisis has been brought about by poor leadership and greed.</p>
<p>In a recent Globe &amp; Mail newspaper article, Professor Henry Mintzberg, of McGill University in Montreal, suggests that much of the blame for economic failure can be tied directly to the failure of management education. Professor Mintzberg goes on to point out that lack of introspection in corporate America prevents leaders from learning from their own mistakes.2</p>
<p>To this day former President George W Bush has never admitted he did anything wrong.</p>
<p>Was his failure as a leader due to having a smaller prefrontal cortex that blocked</p>
<p>him from being introspective?</p>
<p>Quick to anger &#8211; </p>
<p>The ventral area of the prefrontal cortex is known to be crucial for constraining impulsive outbursts. Persons with a predisposition to anger and aggression have been found to have decreased activity in this brain area.</p>
<p>In August of 2004, Darin Dougherty, M.D., an assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, submitted a study, reported in the Vol. 61 No. 8, of the Archives of General Psychiatry.3</p>
<p>In this study, when the subjects started getting angry, blood flow increases in the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex were significantly greater in the healthy control subjects than in the subjects who were prone to anger.</p>
<p>Attaching emotional content to logistical situations is a behavior that is often exhibited by Conservatives.</p>
<p>If you watch Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity, or Ann Coulter, you will see that they repeatedly attach emotional content to logistical behavior. And, the emotion they attach most often is anger.</p>
<p>Do these people have decreased brain activity?</p>
<p>Is the blood just not flowing to their brains?</p>
<p>Impaired ability -</p>
<p>Since the 1980s, scientists have correlated damage to the prefrontal cortex with psychopathic behavior and the inability to make morally and socially acceptable decisions. </p>
<p>Researchers at the University of Sweden have found the prefrontal cortex to be precisely the area of the brain that is impaired in murderers, rapists, and other violent criminals who repeatedly re-offend. At the November 1999 annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Asa Bergvall and her colleagues presented findings on their study of violent offenders.4</p>
<p>The brains of the violent offenders performed normally in every task except the one, which taps prefrontal function, &quot;In that,&rdquo; says Bergvall, &ldquo;It was as if they were retarded.&quot; </p>
<p>They had an impaired ability to shift their attention in order to view the world in a different way &ndash; a function linked to the lateral prefrontal cortex. </p>
<p>Former president George W Bush was often called retarded, because of his impaired ability to shift his view of the world.</p>
<p>But he was no violent criminal.</p>
<p>Neurology professor Dr. Antonio Damasio and colleagues at the University of Iowa College of Medicine reported on two cases of early brain damage to the prefrontal cortex. As adults, both patients showed an almost total lack of guilt.5</p>
<p>?University of Southern California psychopathologist Adrian Raine has documented prefrontal damage in people with Antisocial Personality Disorder, which is characterized by irresponsibility and deceitfulness, lack of emotional depth and remorse.6</p>
<p>His article in the Archives of General Psychiatry, February 1, 2000 stated that, &ldquo;The antisocial men actually had 11-14% less brain tissue volume in their prefrontal cortexes, compared to normal males &ndash; a deficit of about two teaspoons&#039; worth.&quot; </p>
<p>What if George W. Bush has 5-6% less brain tissue volume in his prefrontal cortexes?</p>
<p>Not enough to make him a violent criminal, but just enough to block introspection.</p>
<p>His presidency was certainly characterized by irresponsibility, deceitfulness, and lack of  remorse.</p>
<p>Was this because he was one teaspoon short of a full brain?</p>
<p>The chicken or the egg -</p>
<p>Conservatives are called Conservatives because they share similar beliefs.</p>
<p>Consequently, they exhibit similar behaviors.</p>
<p>Are their beliefs and behaviors similar because they lack the ability for introspection?</p>
<p>Do people become Conservatives because they have smaller prefrontal cortexes?</p>
<p>1 &#8211;  <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100916145047.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/1009&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>2  &#8211; <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/article719382.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>3  &#8211; <a href="http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/61/8/795" rel="nofollow">http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/61/&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>4 &#8211;  <a href="http://www.fi.edu/learn/brain/head.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fi.edu/learn/brain/head.html</a>  </p>
<p>5  &#8211; <a href="http://www.crimetimes.org/00a/w00ap4.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.crimetimes.org/00a/w00ap4.htm</a>  </p>
<p>6 &#8211; <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833485?ordinalpos=1&amp;itool=PPMCLayout.PPMCAppController.PPMCArticlePage.PPMCPubmedRA&amp;linkpos=4" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833485?ordin&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stimulus Plan – A Wing and A Prayer &#124; Cincinnatus Blog /// Political, Social and Environmental Commentary</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-18097</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stimulus Plan – A Wing and A Prayer &#124; Cincinnatus Blog /// Political, Social and Environmental Commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-18097</guid>
		<description>[...] every action there will be an equal and opposite reaction in the future. In this case unproductive deficit spending will inevitably lead to inflation and devaluation of the dollar. The feel-good political expediency [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] every action there will be an equal and opposite reaction in the future. In this case unproductive deficit spending will inevitably lead to inflation and devaluation of the dollar. The feel-good political expediency [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain-Jockey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crunch Time: Stimulus 101</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-16861</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain-Jockey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crunch Time: Stimulus 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-16861</guid>
		<description>[...] our national debt is my biggest worry now.  See what these economists say about the stim [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our national debt is my biggest worry now.  See what these economists say about the stim [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stimulus Plan or Spending Spree &#124; Cincinnatus News</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14749</link>
		<dc:creator>Stimulus Plan or Spending Spree &#124; Cincinnatus News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14749</guid>
		<description>[...] every action there will be an equal and opposite reaction in the future. In this case unproductive deficit spending will inevitably lead to inflation and devaluation of the dollar. The feel good political expediency [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] every action there will be an equal and opposite reaction in the future. In this case unproductive deficit spending will inevitably lead to inflation and devaluation of the dollar. The feel good political expediency [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Hickory, NC</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14708</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Hickory, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14708</guid>
		<description>Sure, we, with our minds truly thinking, our eyes truly seeing, and, yes, our hearts truly feeling, could add more validating and verifying comments here to such ever increasing facts and examples which reveal that Obama and his allies (both Democrat and Republican) are Leftist government elitists promising the people &quot;jobs&quot; and more, yet robbing us of ever more of everything including (non-government) jobs, very much like the archetypical politicians &quot;Shaking our hands with one hand, and robbing us blind with the other&quot;.  
 
However, yet again, to Leftist government elitists such as Obama and his allies, the facts don&#039;t count, only their &quot;inevitable march of history&quot; counts; a &quot;march of history&quot; which features the same dumbing-down for stinkin&#039; thinkin&#039; &quot;class warfare&quot; and blinding, numbing, dependence upon the collective; all of which is only too similar to &quot;The Borg Collective&quot; (of Hollywood &quot;Star Trek&quot; fame) which were also not only dumbed-down for and dependant upon &quot;The Collective&quot;, but also insisted that &quot;resistance is futile&quot;, similar to Leftist Marxists, etc, about their &quot;inevitable march of history&quot;.  
Note: That also explains why Leftist government elitists, such as Obama, identify any and all dissent and opponents to them as being (quoting Obama) &#8220;on the wrong side of history&#8221;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, we, with our minds truly thinking, our eyes truly seeing, and, yes, our hearts truly feeling, could add more validating and verifying comments here to such ever increasing facts and examples which reveal that Obama and his allies (both Democrat and Republican) are Leftist government elitists promising the people &quot;jobs&quot; and more, yet robbing us of ever more of everything including (non-government) jobs, very much like the archetypical politicians &quot;Shaking our hands with one hand, and robbing us blind with the other&quot;. </p>
<p>However, yet again, to Leftist government elitists such as Obama and his allies, the facts don&#039;t count, only their &quot;inevitable march of history&quot; counts; a &quot;march of history&quot; which features the same dumbing-down for stinkin&#039; thinkin&#039; &quot;class warfare&quot; and blinding, numbing, dependence upon the collective; all of which is only too similar to &quot;The Borg Collective&quot; (of Hollywood &quot;Star Trek&quot; fame) which were also not only dumbed-down for and dependant upon &quot;The Collective&quot;, but also insisted that &quot;resistance is futile&quot;, similar to Leftist Marxists, etc, about their &quot;inevitable march of history&quot;. </p>
<p>Note: That also explains why Leftist government elitists, such as Obama, identify any and all dissent and opponents to them as being (quoting Obama) &ldquo;on the wrong side of history&rdquo;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan, California</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan, California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14442</guid>
		<description>It is time to let companies with poor business practices fail. Let the Big Three car companies go bankrupt and reorganize. Then they can start again. The unions are helping to destroy the public schools. Union agency shop and the tenure system are not in the interests of children but to enrich the labor union. The best, most enthusiastic teachers are not always the ones who have been teaching the longest. 
In California, the public schools are a mess, demanding more and more (nearly 60%) of the state budget while producing lower and lower test scores. No matter how much money is thrown at the &quot;problem&quot;.  
I cannot spend more than I have and neither should government. People have been overspending with credit cards, equitylines and other means of lending. Buy now, pay later has become our nation&#039;s motto. People and government need to learn to live within their means. Now those of us who have been careful with our money are supposed to bail out those who have been stupid? 
 
Borrowing more money to start more layers of government will not solve the problems we have. 
Obama&#039;s freeze on salaries is a start but he needs to clean house completely, but I doubt that will happen. He has a lot of personal payback due from getting elected. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is time to let companies with poor business practices fail. Let the Big Three car companies go bankrupt and reorganize. Then they can start again. The unions are helping to destroy the public schools. Union agency shop and the tenure system are not in the interests of children but to enrich the labor union. The best, most enthusiastic teachers are not always the ones who have been teaching the longest.</p>
<p>In California, the public schools are a mess, demanding more and more (nearly 60%) of the state budget while producing lower and lower test scores. No matter how much money is thrown at the &quot;problem&quot;. </p>
<p>I cannot spend more than I have and neither should government. People have been overspending with credit cards, equitylines and other means of lending. Buy now, pay later has become our nation&#039;s motto. People and government need to learn to live within their means. Now those of us who have been careful with our money are supposed to bail out those who have been stupid?</p>
<p>Borrowing more money to start more layers of government will not solve the problems we have.</p>
<p>Obama&#039;s freeze on salaries is a start but he needs to clean house completely, but I doubt that will happen. He has a lot of personal payback due from getting elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom, Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14225</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom, Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14225</guid>
		<description>We need to suck it up.  The government got us into this mess and they need to get out of the world of capitalism.  They don&#039;t listen, I agree with  the roofer who says he is just one small voice.......so were the people who founded this country.  We need to revolt(peacefully) against our representatives who are not representing us!!!!  I do not understand why when the TARP monies that did not work, they would do it again.  Infrastructure will not work.....it&#039;s been proven over and over again.  I keep hearing that we are going to clean up the eduction system and build new schools, better equiped......has anyone taken a good look at our schools in the depressed socioeconomic areas of the big cities......it is not the building.....if that were true a one room school house would never have worked.  We are missing the nuclear family in these areas, we are missing values, we have learned to accept poor behavior as &quot;oh it just the times&quot;.  The schooling of a child is still the responsibility of the family(mother AND father)....not the government.  Providing new buildings with new equipment won&#039;t change the fact that these kids don&#039;t even come to school.  Republicans need to return to their core values of small government and &quot;free&quot; enterprise. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to suck it up.  The government got us into this mess and they need to get out of the world of capitalism.  They don&#039;t listen, I agree with  the roofer who says he is just one small voice&#8230;&#8230;.so were the people who founded this country.  We need to revolt(peacefully) against our representatives who are not representing us!!!!  I do not understand why when the TARP monies that did not work, they would do it again.  Infrastructure will not work&#8230;..it&#039;s been proven over and over again.  I keep hearing that we are going to clean up the eduction system and build new schools, better equiped&#8230;&#8230;has anyone taken a good look at our schools in the depressed socioeconomic areas of the big cities&#8230;&#8230;it is not the building&#8230;..if that were true a one room school house would never have worked.  We are missing the nuclear family in these areas, we are missing values, we have learned to accept poor behavior as &quot;oh it just the times&quot;.  The schooling of a child is still the responsibility of the family(mother AND father)&#8230;.not the government.  Providing new buildings with new equipment won&#039;t change the fact that these kids don&#039;t even come to school.  Republicans need to return to their core values of small government and &quot;free&quot; enterprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Mankiw v. Paul Krugman Hubris &#187; KRUGMAN WATCH</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14209</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Mankiw v. Paul Krugman Hubris &#187; KRUGMAN WATCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14209</guid>
		<description>[...] Krugman left out Gary Becker, Tyler Cowen, Russel Roberts and Don Boudreaux, Walter Williams, and all these people (via John Boehner&#8217;s page) Also, a few others here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Krugman left out Gary Becker, Tyler Cowen, Russel Roberts and Don Boudreaux, Walter Williams, and all these people (via John Boehner&#8217;s page) Also, a few others here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Armstrong Terre</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14206</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Armstrong Terre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/21/deficit-spending-stimulus-skeptics/#comment-14206</guid>
		<description>Put all of this on a national ballot and let american public decide what must be done and send all the politions home and this will go away. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put all of this on a national ballot and let american public decide what must be done and send all the politions home and this will go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

