• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Making Entitlement Reform a "Central Part" of Deficit Reduction

    Responding to the sticker shock of the Congressional Budget Office’s projected record $1.2 trillion budget deficit, President-elect Barack Obama said:

    We will — we are working currently on our budget plans. We are beginning consultations with members of Congress around how we expect to approach the deficit. We expect that discussion around entitlements will be a part, a central part, of those plans. And I would expect that by February, in line with the announcement of at least a rough budget outline, that we will have more to say about how we’re going to approach entitlement spending, how we’re going to approach eliminating waste in government, one of Nancy’s tasks.

    So we will have some very specific outlines in terms of how it’s going to be done.

    The Heritage Foundation can’t wait to see these ‘very specific outlines’. We sincerely hope Obama is being honest when he says, “I’m not out to increase the size of the government long- term.” A key test will be seeing if he keeps his promise to the American people to enact a net cut on government spending. Addressing the long term financial threat that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid pose must be part of fulfilling this promise.

    This spring, 16 federal budget experts from seven think tanks (including American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, Concord Coalition, The Heritage Foundation, New America Foundation, Progressive Policy Institute and Urban Institute) issued a paper concluding that automatic, escalating benefits from Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will cause “unsustainable deficits in the federal budget” that “threaten the health and vigor of the American economy.” Their report concludes: “Our group has come together, from diverse points on the political spectrum, to sound an alarm: if America is to remain strong, such evasions must end.”

    Moving to “specific” steps, the authors propose:

    • Congress should enact a real long-term budget for Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security that would limit their growth, take them off auto-pilot, and curb their current ability in the budget process to pre-empt funds from other types of programs, such as defense.
    • Congress and the President should enact long-term budgets for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid and be required to review them every five years. The rules for the five-year review must include a trigger or action-forcing device that automatically make changes when projected spending exceeds budgeted amounts.
    • The long-run costs of these three programs should be made visible in the budget at all times and considered when decisions are made.

    These are just some necessary first steps to bringing entitlement spending under control. If we really want to address our long term financial problems, we will also have to rethink social insurance entirely.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Making Entitlement Reform a "Central Part" of Deficit Reduction

    1. L.Lotter, Reston, VA says:

      Beyond the fact that all of these programs are unconstitutional on their face, it is, in Hayek’s words, a ‘Fatal Conceit’ to think that either Congress or the Heritage Foundation intellectuals are capable of designing anything to replace the market. The goal that we should be advancing is how best to end these monstrosities and let freedom and personal responsibility regain its proper place in our society.

    2. Barb -mn says:

      The only "entitlement" the government should provide is to the elderly, military and those that suffer mental and or physical disabilities that are not brought on by their own choices.

      And remember, the job of the government is to" protect and serve" equally for the common good of all mankind. Look what it's become. COMMUNISM!

    3. Mike Sheahen, Hickor says:

      Expecting Leftist/government elitist politicians to "rethink social insurance entirely" (which includes the things listed) and so "tamper with" or even "derail" any part of their "gravey-train" of vote, money, and power buying legislation and programs, is akin to both trying to "pull teeth from a chicken" and "expecting a Zebra to change his stripes", also known as "denying the facts and departing from reality".

      Again, at risk for belaboring this point, we have to look to the elections of 2010 and 2012 to even begin to expect what will probably remain in the meantime, under a Leftist/Socialist Obama and Congress, the unaccomplished miracle of those things listed with the necessity to "rethink social insurance entirely".

    4. Roberto Lane says:

      This is a remarkable text. It's totally an article I'll check out again.

    5. rio balto, florida says:

      1) Social Security is an Entitlement?

      Any one who receives SS benefits to my knowledge has paid into it. The federal Government has abused the system by constantly robbing the Piggy Bank & dipping into it to cover other unrelated expences.

      2) Military Entitlements? There exists a detailed contract of reponsibilities & compensations between the citizens called upon to fight in our many conflicts, wars, military engagements. How could anyone possibly consider breaching this trust?

      3) End Multinational Entitlements, welfare to Big Business & the overseas/foriegn country give-a-ways. Go after the Congressional & other governmental overbloated Entiltlements before you raid the legitimate & necessary programs earned by the people who actually make the country work & have sacrificed unselfishly.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.