• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • A Double Standard on Inaugural Tickets

    Let’s say you decide tomorrow that you want to attend the inauguration the week after next. And let’s assume that, like most Americans, you do not have any political ‘in’ with the new administration or any of the congressional offices handing tickets out to donors and supporters. What are your options?

    So far as I can tell, you’ve got three. If your elected representatives have any not yet allocated, you could get on their lists—but it’s a longshot. Second, you may still be able to buy a set of four tickets from the inaugural committee at a reported cost of $50,000. The third option: Score one off of Craigslist, from someone who obtained tickets legitimately, at a fraction of the cost, though still probably hundreds of dollars or more.

    So guess which one Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) wants to ban? Legislation she re-introduced this week (S. 60, see p. 21) would punish the sale, and possibly the purchase, of inaugural tickets with criminal fines and up to one year in federal prison.

    The logic seems to be that selling a ticket to attend this historic event is so wrongful that it must be punished severely—a year in prison is no walk in the park—unless, that is, the seller is the inaugural committee, in which case anything goes, even at $50,000 a pop.

    This double standard should be a good clue that selling inaugural tickets isn’t an appropriate target of a criminal prohibition. The criminal law is supposed to focus on actions that actually harm society, not just those things that Members of Congress dislike. That’s a misuse of the criminal law, and it makes the law less effective as a system to communicate society’s fundamental values.

    New criminal offenses like this deserve deliberation and scrutiny by Congress and should not be fast-tracked. That means hearings, mark-ups, and the other tools that Members of Congress use to ensure that the result of the lawmaking process is good policy, not knee-jerk criminalization.

    Any Members who supports sound criminal law, whatever their view on the underlying merits of Feinstein’s proposal, should be willing to slow this bill down to make sure it receives the attention that new criminal offenses always deserve.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to A Double Standard on Inaugural Tickets

    1. Mike Sheahen, Hickor says:

      We can just hear the incredible cries of "Republicans! Party of 'the rich'!" coming from the Democrats if such things were being done for the inauguration of a Republican President!

      Oh but evidently such things are "ok" to Democrats such as Feinstein, as long as, such as in this case, "the inaugural committee" is not "cut out of the action", at which point it is turned back into being so "wrong" it must "legislated" into being "a crime"!

      The Democrat Party is "the Party of the common man, not 'the rich'"? Such a claim is both evidently and obviously false to any but those who are willfully blind, perhaps also "rich" enough to pay $50,000 for tickets, and/or agreeable to "criminalizing" (as Feinstein wants to do) anyone who is found under such disingenuous, inconsistent, and capricious disfavor as in this case!

    2. Marshall Hill-Michig says:

      These are the Reasonable Politicians who have their Nose to the ground,getting all the facts

      to enact Legislation for the good of the People!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×