<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, Serious Deficit Spending is Not Immediately Needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sheahen, Hickor</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sheahen, Hickor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12339</guid>
		<description>Correction: Senator Judd Gregg says serious deficit spending is needed immediately, eh?  
 
Well, there you have a prime example of a Liberal/Socialist RIPO (Republican In Party Only), not a &quot;Conservative&quot; Republican!  
 
What ever happened to the erstwhile and heretofore horrible &quot;Three-headed monster&quot; of &quot;Deficit spending&quot;, &quot;an unbalanced Federal budget&quot;, and &quot;the National debt&quot;, all blamed, of course, on presumed &quot;Conservative&quot; Republicans???  
 
Indeed, what ever happened to the wrong of &quot;deficit spending by the Republican-controlled Congress&quot;, which is what the Democrats used to regain control of Congress?  
What, it&#039;s only wrong &quot;when Republicans are in control and do it&quot; but not &quot;when Democrats are in control and do it&quot;?  
 
Interesting...When employers engage in such misbehavior, they end-up bankrupt and/or even dragged before Congress and &quot;hung&quot; for such &quot;wrong-doing&quot; (unless certain politicians can use it to go for more votes, power, and money [such as in the so-called &quot;Auto bail-out&quot;]); when we private individuals do so, we&#039;ll also end-up bankrupt and perhaps even in prison, yet &quot;serious deficit spending&quot; is &quot;ok&quot; for Liberal/Socialist politicians to engage in when it suits their fancy, eh? Not!!!  
 
News flash! There are already more than enough such &quot;deficit spending&quot; time-bombs to blow what remains of both our individual and National economies and budgets into Socialist oblivion. Example: The coming Social Security debacle caused by Federal misappropriation of &quot;payroll contributions&quot;, &quot;deficit spending&quot;, and other things which we won&#039;t get into here.  
 
In any case, the absolutely true fact of the matter is that it is absolutely wrong and unconscionable to burden and tax any generation, current or subsequent, with deficit spending; no matter what politician&#039;s fancy it &quot;suits&quot;, and no matter who is doing it, &quot;Democrat&quot; or &quot;Republican&quot;! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: Senator Judd Gregg says serious deficit spending is needed immediately, eh? </p>
<p>Well, there you have a prime example of a Liberal/Socialist RIPO (Republican In Party Only), not a &quot;Conservative&quot; Republican! </p>
<p>What ever happened to the erstwhile and heretofore horrible &quot;Three-headed monster&quot; of &quot;Deficit spending&quot;, &quot;an unbalanced Federal budget&quot;, and &quot;the National debt&quot;, all blamed, of course, on presumed &quot;Conservative&quot; Republicans??? </p>
<p>Indeed, what ever happened to the wrong of &quot;deficit spending by the Republican-controlled Congress&quot;, which is what the Democrats used to regain control of Congress? </p>
<p>What, it&#039;s only wrong &quot;when Republicans are in control and do it&quot; but not &quot;when Democrats are in control and do it&quot;? </p>
<p>Interesting&#8230;When employers engage in such misbehavior, they end-up bankrupt and/or even dragged before Congress and &quot;hung&quot; for such &quot;wrong-doing&quot; (unless certain politicians can use it to go for more votes, power, and money [such as in the so-called &quot;Auto bail-out&quot;]); when we private individuals do so, we&#039;ll also end-up bankrupt and perhaps even in prison, yet &quot;serious deficit spending&quot; is &quot;ok&quot; for Liberal/Socialist politicians to engage in when it suits their fancy, eh? Not!!! </p>
<p>News flash! There are already more than enough such &quot;deficit spending&quot; time-bombs to blow what remains of both our individual and National economies and budgets into Socialist oblivion. Example: The coming Social Security debacle caused by Federal misappropriation of &quot;payroll contributions&quot;, &quot;deficit spending&quot;, and other things which we won&#039;t get into here. </p>
<p>In any case, the absolutely true fact of the matter is that it is absolutely wrong and unconscionable to burden and tax any generation, current or subsequent, with deficit spending; no matter what politician&#039;s fancy it &quot;suits&quot;, and no matter who is doing it, &quot;Democrat&quot; or &quot;Republican&quot;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sheahen, Hickor</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12336</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sheahen, Hickor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12336</guid>
		<description>Senator Judd Greeg says serious deficit spending is needed immediately, eh?  
 
Well, there you have a prime example of a Liberal/Socialist RIPO (Republican In Party Only), not a &quot;Conservative&quot; Republican!  
 
What ever happened to the erstwhile and heretofore horrible &quot;Three-headed monster&quot; of &quot;Deficit spending&quot;, &quot;an unbalanced Federal budget&quot;, and &quot;the National debt&quot;, all blamed, of course, on presumed &quot;Conservative&quot; Republicans???  
 
Indeed, what ever happened to the wrong of &quot;deficit spending by the Republican-controlled Congress&quot;, which is what the Democrats used to regain control of Congress?  
What, it&#039;s only wrong &quot;when Republicans are in control and do it&quot; but not &quot;when Democrats are in control and do it&quot;?  
 
Interesting...When employers engage in such misbehavior, they end-up bankrupt and/or even dragged before Congress and &quot;hung&quot; for such &quot;wrong-doing&quot; (unless certain politicians can use it to go for more votes, power, and money [such as in the so-called &quot;Auto bail-out&quot;]); when we private individuals do so, we&#039;ll also end-up bankrupt and perhaps even in prison, yet &quot;serious deficit spending&quot; is &quot;ok&quot; when it suits Liberal/Socialist politicans fancy, eh? Not!!!  
 
News flash! There are already more than enough such &quot;deficit spending&quot; time-bombs to soon enough blow both what remains of both our individual and National budgets into Socialist oblivion. Example: The coming Social Security debacle caused by Federal misappropriation of &quot;payroll contribitions&quot;, &quot;deficit spending&quot;, and other things which we won&#039;t get into here.  
 
In any case, the absolutely true fact of the matter is that it is absolutely wrong and unconscionable to burden and tax any generation, current or subsequent, with deficit spending; no matter what politician&#039;s fancy it &quot;suits&quot;, and no matter who is doing it, &quot;Democrat&quot; or &quot;Republican&quot;! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Judd Greeg says serious deficit spending is needed immediately, eh? </p>
<p>Well, there you have a prime example of a Liberal/Socialist RIPO (Republican In Party Only), not a &quot;Conservative&quot; Republican! </p>
<p>What ever happened to the erstwhile and heretofore horrible &quot;Three-headed monster&quot; of &quot;Deficit spending&quot;, &quot;an unbalanced Federal budget&quot;, and &quot;the National debt&quot;, all blamed, of course, on presumed &quot;Conservative&quot; Republicans??? </p>
<p>Indeed, what ever happened to the wrong of &quot;deficit spending by the Republican-controlled Congress&quot;, which is what the Democrats used to regain control of Congress? </p>
<p>What, it&#039;s only wrong &quot;when Republicans are in control and do it&quot; but not &quot;when Democrats are in control and do it&quot;? </p>
<p>Interesting&#8230;When employers engage in such misbehavior, they end-up bankrupt and/or even dragged before Congress and &quot;hung&quot; for such &quot;wrong-doing&quot; (unless certain politicians can use it to go for more votes, power, and money [such as in the so-called &quot;Auto bail-out&quot;]); when we private individuals do so, we&#039;ll also end-up bankrupt and perhaps even in prison, yet &quot;serious deficit spending&quot; is &quot;ok&quot; when it suits Liberal/Socialist politicans fancy, eh? Not!!! </p>
<p>News flash! There are already more than enough such &quot;deficit spending&quot; time-bombs to soon enough blow both what remains of both our individual and National budgets into Socialist oblivion. Example: The coming Social Security debacle caused by Federal misappropriation of &quot;payroll contribitions&quot;, &quot;deficit spending&quot;, and other things which we won&#039;t get into here. </p>
<p>In any case, the absolutely true fact of the matter is that it is absolutely wrong and unconscionable to burden and tax any generation, current or subsequent, with deficit spending; no matter what politician&#039;s fancy it &quot;suits&quot;, and no matter who is doing it, &quot;Democrat&quot; or &quot;Republican&quot;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiritof76, New Hamp</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12319</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiritof76, New Hamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12319</guid>
		<description>In the 1930&#039;s, FDR cabinet loaded with socialists engaged in massive government spending to lift the nation out of depression actually extended it into 1939.  The so called tax cuts to people and failing businesses that do not pay taxes is actually transfer of wealth through welfare payments.  Obama lingo: Taxcut= welfare payment. 
Get ready for a triple double- double digit unemployment, inflation and interest rates in another year. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 1930&#039;s, FDR cabinet loaded with socialists engaged in massive government spending to lift the nation out of depression actually extended it into 1939.  The so called tax cuts to people and failing businesses that do not pay taxes is actually transfer of wealth through welfare payments.  Obama lingo: Taxcut= welfare payment.</p>
<p>Get ready for a triple double- double digit unemployment, inflation and interest rates in another year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No, Serious Deficit Spending is Not Immediately Needed » The Foundry &#124; debtdeficit.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12272</link>
		<dc:creator>No, Serious Deficit Spending is Not Immediately Needed » The Foundry &#124; debtdeficit.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12272</guid>
		<description>[...] No, Serious Deficit Spending is Not Immediately Needed » The Foundry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No, Serious Deficit Spending is Not Immediately Needed » The Foundry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Brown, Hiram,</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12295</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Brown, Hiram,</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12295</guid>
		<description>It is refreshing to read an article that takes a reasonable approach to the economy.  My hope is that Mr. Obama will reconsider putting the country in more debt ($10 trillion is plenty).  Tax cuts for everyone, including the rich and corporations, will expand the economy.  This has been proven time and again.  Thank you for this refreshing article. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is refreshing to read an article that takes a reasonable approach to the economy.  My hope is that Mr. Obama will reconsider putting the country in more debt ($10 trillion is plenty).  Tax cuts for everyone, including the rich and corporations, will expand the economy.  This has been proven time and again.  Thank you for this refreshing article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnum Serpentine, N</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12255</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnum Serpentine, N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12255</guid>
		<description>I am so glad that Congress, and not the Heritage Foundation, is running this nation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so glad that Congress, and not the Heritage Foundation, is running this nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb -mn</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12245</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb -mn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2009/01/05/no-serious-deficit-spending-is-not-immediately-needed/#comment-12245</guid>
		<description>But the government will fear American citizens anyway! 
The problem is clear: Government officials refuse to grasp reality. They have NO WILL TO GRASP REALITY just everything democracy DOESN&#039;T STAND FOR... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the government will fear American citizens anyway!</p>
<p>The problem is clear: Government officials refuse to grasp reality. They have NO WILL TO GRASP REALITY just everything democracy DOESN&#039;T STAND FOR&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

