• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Some Pro-Growth Alternatives to Obama's Fantasy Based Stimulus

    Massive deficit spending on a level not contemplated since World War II is not the only policy option available for addressing the recession. Some worthy ideas ripped from today’s op-ed pages:

    Clive Crook for free trade in The Financial Times:

    Opinion in the next Congress, with its enlarged Democratic majorities, would have shifted to a more hostile position on trade even if the economy had been healthy – which it is not. With unemployment rising, wages under pressure and no firm countervailing push from the administration, protecting jobs (or claiming to, at any rate) is likely to be a higher priority than liberal trade. The prospects for widening the opportunities for international commerce look grim.

    Since this is a global recession, the danger of an upsurge in protectionist sentiment is not confined to the US. The consequences of that would be all the more threatening against a background of already shrinking output and trade flows. American leadership on the issue has never been more important.

    Michael Malone for leaner regulations in The Wall Street Journal:

    From the beginning of this decade, the process of new company creation has been under assault by legislators and regulators. They treat it as if it is a natural phenomenon that can be manipulated and exploited, rather than the fragile creation of several generations of hard work, risk-taking and inventiveness. In the name of “fairness,” preventing future Enrons, and increased oversight, Congress, the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have piled burdens onto the economy that put entrepreneurship at risk.

    The new laws and regulations have neither prevented frauds nor instituted fairness. But they have managed to kill the creation of new public companies in the U.S., cripple the venture capital business, and damage entrepreneurship. According to the National Venture Capital Association, in all of 2008 there have been just six companies that have gone public. Compare that with 269 IPOs in 1999, 272 in 1996, and 365 in 1986.

    FedEx president Frederick Smith for competitive corporate tax rates in The Financial Times:

    Our tax system is particularly onerous for asset-intensive, industrial businesses such as manufacturers and transport companies. For example, Caterpillar, Boeing, FedEx, commercial airlines and carmakers produce goods and services and provide jobs for millions. But to maintain or increase jobs and compete globally, these companies must be able earn an acceptable return on capital expenditure.

    How can we make US companies more competitive and increase their ability to offer good jobs? Two things: accelerate the expensing of capital investment; and reduce the corporate income tax rate.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Some Pro-Growth Alternatives to Obama's Fantasy Based Stimulus

    1. Pingback: Some Pro-Growth Alternatives to Obama’s Fantasy Based Stimulus « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

    2. Pingback: Four Years of No Entrepreneurship? | The Sundries Shack

    3. RealWorld, Philadelp says:

      (a) Free trade is not an alternative to the fiscal stimulus — both can happen in parallel.

      (b) Facebook and YouTube got bought out before they needed to IPO. The slow pace of IPOs is related to a lack of faith in the free market. Only in the fantasies that the WSJ publishes would anyone assume that there are few IPOs because of regulations, and confuse IPOs for new company creation.

      (c) Lower tax rates — that tired old conservative snake oil that can cure cancer, fix the economy and solve global hunger. Grow up!

    4. Pingback: Policy Alternatives To Keynesianism We Are Apparently Not Allowed To Talk About - Pejman_Yousefzadeh’s blog - RedState

    5. Pingback: Policy Alternatives To Keynesianism We Are Apparently Not Allowed To Talk About - Pejman_Yousefzadeh’s blog - RedState

    6. Pingback: ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » Policy Alternatives To Keynesianism We Are Apparently Not Allowed To Talk About

    7. Michael says:

      Didn't we get into this mess by spending too much? And the solution is to spend more? This isn't even what Keynes was referring to. He envisioned individuals saving too much out of an irrational fear during a recession. See this post for a closer look at how fiscal stimulus today is not even Keynesianism.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.