• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Barack Obama's Faith Based Stimulus

    Defending the ever ballooning size of the Obama Administration’s proposed economic stimulus package, Obama’s soon to be White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers told Bloomberg: “There is not going to be any spending money for the sake of spending money.” Oh, really?

    First let’s dispose of the complete fantasy that there is any measure of logic or reason going into the crafting of this stimulus plan. Just witness the wide range of numbers being thrown about for total size of the measure:

    So in the span of just one week, the Obama Administration claims it is planning on spending anywhere from $600 billion to $1.3 trillion all to save a very scientific sounding 3 million jobs over two years. All of these numbers are complete fantasy. There is no body of economic research out there that is informing these ‘experts’ guesses as to how big an economic stimulus needs to be. The Obama Administration is pulling these numbers out of thin air. George Mason University economist Tyler Cowen writes:

    The bottom line is this: we are being asked to believe that a big, trillion or even multi-trillion fiscal stimulus can boost the current macroeconomy. If you look at history, there isn’t good reason to believe that. Any single example, such as the Nazis, can be knocked down for lack of relevance or lack of correspondence to current conditions. Fair enough. But the burden of proof isn’t on the skeptics. It’s up to the advocates of the trillion dollar expenditure to come up with the convincing examples of a fiscal-led recovery. Right now we’re mostly at “It wasn’t really tried.” And then a mental retreat back into the notion that surely good public sector project opportunities are out there. So what you have is the possibility of faith — or lack thereof — that our government will spend this money well.

    And just how fine tuned is the Obama Administration’s system at telling the “surely good public sector project opportunities” from the bad ones? The Washington Post reports:

    An Obama adviser involved in crafting the stimulus package said the transition team was keenly aware of the potential pitfalls and was focused on funding ideas that would quickly pump money into the sagging economy, fulfilling Obama’s promise to create or preserve 2.5 million jobs by 2011. Because many ideas probably won’t meet that standard, the adviser said, the team is developing a screen to keep them out.

    That better be one hell of screen because the Sacramento Bee reports:

    Cash-strapped states and cities are salivating at the prospect of the largest public works program since the New Deal.

    In California alone, officials have identified $28 billion worth of ready-to-go projects. They range from upgrading the access to the Golden Gate Bridge to realigning Interstate 5 north of Redding – and everyone wants a piece of the action.

    “It was like make-a-wish,” said a skeptical Rep. Dennis Cardoza, D-Merced. “People saw this as, let’s see if we can hit the federal government lottery.”

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Barack Obama's Faith Based Stimulus

    1. Matt, Cleveland says:

      So that's $6 billion to save 3 million jobs; $200,000 per job.

    2. Pingback: Barack Obama’s Faith Based Stimulus « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

    3. Edward Foster says:

      Matt from Cleveland:

      I saw 1.3 TRILLION to save 3 million jobs. That's $433,333.33 per job. Welfare is cheaper!

    4. Jack Lohman says:

      Yeah, sort of like W's tax break for the wealthy were going to create jobs. Duh!!!

    5. David Dillon, Ohio says:

      How does the federal government CREATE jobs anywaY. It doesn't PRODUCE anything! It can only attempt to provide the economic environment conducive to job growth. Oh, wait a minute… never mind…

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.