• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Newest Neo-Hooverites

    So desperate for a government takeover of the U.S. auto industry, some on the left are now stooping to borrowing rhetoric from Vice President Dick Cheney to make their case for the bailout of Detroit’s Big Three. Commenting on Cheney’s warning that “If we don’t do this, [the GOP] will be known as the party of Herbert Hoover,” The Washington Monthly‘s Steve Benen writes:

    The Neo-Hooverite caucus apparently seems willing to wear the label with pride.

    Well let’s just see who else, besides conservatives, has called for the auto companies to go through Chapter 11 instead of receiving a federal bailout. Let’s start with lefty hero and Stanford law professor Larry Lessig:

    I’m willing to be persuaded that intervention is necessary there. But the more I read about the auto industry, the less I am convinced.

    People speak about this as if not bailing out Detroit means automobile production in America ends. That’s not what failing to bailout Detroit means. Not intervening now would be these automakers would enter bankruptcy. And bankruptcy means the assets of these dinosaurs get reorganized: Someone else buys these companies, at a price the market sets, and runs them profitably, because of the price the market set.

    Obviously, that change would not be painless. And I’m all for minimizing the pain where the pain is doing no good — with workers, or others depending upon these industries. But I’m against interventions designed to minimize the pain where the pain would do good — by radically changing how that industry is managed. The whole justification for insanely high executive compensation is, in part, so they can weather such storms. I don’t see why the government should be in the business of building safety nets for the (relatively) well off.

    So Larry Lessig is now a neo-Hooverite. Let’s see who else we can add to the list. How about John Bates Clark Medal winner and progressive favorite Joseph Stiglitz. He writes:

    The US car industry will not be shut down, but it does need to be restructured. That is what Chapter 11 of America’s bankruptcy code is supposed to do. A variant of pre-packaged bankruptcy – where all the terms are set before going before the bankruptcy court – can allow them to produce better and more environmentally sound cars. It can also address legacy retiree obligations. The companies may need additional finance. Given the state of financial markets, the US government may have to provide that at terms that give the taxpayers a full return to compensate them for the risk. Government guarantees can provide assurances, as they did two decades ago when Chrysler faced its crisis.

    With financial restructuring, the real assets do not disappear. Equity investors (who failed to fulfil their responsibility of oversight) lose everything; bondholders get converted into equity owners and may lose substantial amounts. Freed of the obligation to pay interest, the carmakers will be in a better position. Taxpayer dollars will go far further. Moral hazard – the undermining of incentives – will be averted: a strong message will be sent.

    The Heritage Foundation warmly welcomes Lessig and Stiglitz to the neo-Hooverite club. And we also hope the left enjoys continuing to borrow their talking points from the Bush White House.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to The Newest Neo-Hooverites

    1. Pingback: The Newest Neo-Hooverites « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

    2. Mithras says:

      Five more weeks until competence arrives at the White House. I can't wait to start cleaning up the messes you rightwingers have left.

    3. Kiwi, Dallas says:

      L. Lessig seems to show a bit of a Pro labour bias (surprise, surprise) in assuming that economic hardship the auto workers might suffer "is doing no good". A stubborn and self centered United Auto Workers Union is just as much at fault for the dire condition the US Auto Industry is in as poor management and bad product. The biggest difference between US cars produced in America and Japanese cars produced in America is however not management or quality, it is the cost of labour, and it is this that has been pushing the US Auto Industry towards a cliff for the last few decades. When given a chance to let up and help the industry that provides all of the jobs the auto workers have the Union refused to match Japanese auto workers wages and chose instead to continue to push the US car companies over the cliff. Given the option of keeping their jobs at lower wages the Union has decided to risk loosing all of it's members jobs instead.

      Just as loosing your investment provides feedback for making bad business decisions, loosing your job provides great feedback for choosing bad labour representation.

    4. Wes Thompson says:

      How would you like to have only foreign vehicles in the US? Are you that stupid that the only thing you think of is how bad you think our auto industryh is doing. I am old enough to still remember what wars we fought and who we fought them with. Why do you want to support them, send all your money to them when you buy their products. I beleve in a strong AMERICA not a land that only has products from overseas.

    5. Roy G Callahan says:

      he big lie is that nobody will buy American cars if the automakers do a Chapter 11. That's garbage. A Chapter 11 will allow the necessary restruction to make them viable. There is no gain if there's no pain, and nationalization, with a government loan is not the way to go.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×