- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Government Spending Is Never the Answer
Posted By Guinevere Nell On December 9, 2008 @ 1:31 pm In Economics | Comments Disabled
A Christian Science Monitor  article this morning argues that Roosevelt didn’t spend enough to jolt economy into recovery. Only when spending skyrocketed for World War Two did the economy recover (unemployment finally dropped, of course this was because everyone was mobilized either as soldier or to support the war effort – creating things which were then destroyed in fighting the war). The Article claims that “One big reason is that President Roosevelt didn’t spend enough to really boost the economy, historians say.”
Notice, that it isn’t economists that argued that the programs should have been bigger in order to boost the economy, but historians. This is like getting a philosopher’s opinion on astrophysics. It’s nice, but it shouldn’t be taken as expert.
The article goes on to point out that many economists do think that government spending can stimulate an economy. So, let’s examine this argument a little more closely. After 1929 and before World War Two, federal expenditures  tripled as a percent of Gross Domestic Product. If we tripled federal expenditures as a percentage of GDP today, that would mean an additional 8.2 trillion dollars in government spending each year. That is because federal expenditures are already 20 percent of GDP.
Perhaps we don’t have to also triple the government’s role to have the same “stimulus” as Roosevelt. One might argue it is the amount of spending as a percentage of the economy that matters. Roosevelt added about seven percentage points overall of additional annual federal spending (bringing spending from about 3 percent of GDP to about 10 percent).
An additional seven percentage points of GDP today constitutes an additional $1 trillion per year. This is a lot less than 8.2 trillion, but it is still nothing to sneeze at. Yet, are we not already pouring in this much to the financial bailouts? This is the same amount of additional government spending already – hence the need for journalists to argue that FDR’s additional spending wasn’t enough.
The problem is that government spending will never be enough to stimulate the economy. Just think about it this way. We have GDP of about $42,000 per capita. The federal government spends about 20% of GDP. In England, government spends about 45 percent of GDP and GDP per capita is about $33,000. In Sweden, the government spends about 50 percent of GDP and GDP is only $32,000 per capita. In France, it is 53% and $30,000. As we all know, in countries where government spends approximately 100 percent of GDP hardly any output or value is created. This insight formed the basis for such respected indices as the Index of Economic Freedom .
So, the idea that injecting a jolt into the economy by having government spend more as a percent of GDP is highly suspect. If what Roosevelt spent was not enough – despite tripling the government expenditures at the time – we should wonder whether any amount will ever be enough.
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2008/12/09/government-spending-is-never-the-answer/
URLs in this post:
 Christian Science Monitor: http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/1209/p01s03-usgn.html
 federal expenditures: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy09/sheets/hist01z2.xls
 Index of Economic Freedom: http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/index.cfm
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.