<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s New Budget Chief: Green Job Spending &#8216;Totally Impractical&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2008/12/05/obamas-new-budget-chief-green-job-spening-totally-impractical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/12/05/obamas-new-budget-chief-green-job-spening-totally-impractical/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pollution Credits</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/12/05/obamas-new-budget-chief-green-job-spening-totally-impractical/#comment-11728</link>
		<dc:creator>Pollution Credits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/12/05/obamas-new-budget-chief-green-job-spening-totally-impractical/#comment-11728</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama&#8217;s New Budget Chief: Green Job Spening &#8220;Totally Impractical&#8221;That means that the green-jobs program would not be financed with pollution credits bought by power generators and other carbon emitters, but instead would be added to the budget deficit. And supporters of cap and trade should not hold . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama&#8217;s New Budget Chief: Green Job Spening &#8220;Totally Impractical&#8221;That means that the green-jobs program would not be financed with pollution credits bought by power generators and other carbon emitters, but instead would be added to the budget deficit. And supporters of cap and trade should not hold . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama’s New Budget Chief: Green Job Spening “Totally Impractical” &#171; Conservative Thoughts and Profundity</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/12/05/obamas-new-budget-chief-green-job-spening-totally-impractical/#comment-10409</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama’s New Budget Chief: Green Job Spening “Totally Impractical” &#171; Conservative Thoughts and Profundity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/12/05/obamas-new-budget-chief-green-job-spening-totally-impractical/#comment-10409</guid>
		<description>[...] So Obama wants to spend $150 billion on subsidies for ‘clean’ energy over the next ten years. And what does Obama’s new budget chief, Peter Orzag think of these projects? Continue reading . . . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So Obama wants to spend $150 billion on subsidies for ‘clean’ energy over the next ten years. And what does Obama’s new budget chief, Peter Orzag think of these projects? Continue reading . . . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

