<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind Suppliers are Paying People to Take Their Energy.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete schweaty</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/#comment-10141</link>
		<dc:creator>pete schweaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/#comment-10141</guid>
		<description>wind energy needs a boost as does solar.  why hasn&#039;t a nuke been built in the last 30 yrs?- its not simple.  There are secutiry and environmental concerns there.  I am not really pro wind or solar.  BUT there is no silver bullit either. btw- I think what TX (US leader in wind power) is doing is nuts adding 18GW in the 6-7 yrs.  I would rather see more Nuke but I think the real story is trying to strike a balance.  it seams most of the comments posted here prove people have a hard time balancing that in their minds. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wind energy needs a boost as does solar.  why hasn&#039;t a nuke been built in the last 30 yrs?- its not simple.  There are secutiry and environmental concerns there.  I am not really pro wind or solar.  BUT there is no silver bullit either. btw- I think what TX (US leader in wind power) is doing is nuts adding 18GW in the 6-7 yrs.  I would rather see more Nuke but I think the real story is trying to strike a balance.  it seams most of the comments posted here prove people have a hard time balancing that in their minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W Howard Baker, Bard</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/#comment-9941</link>
		<dc:creator>W Howard Baker, Bard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/#comment-9941</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t seem to understand.  Obama and the Democrat Congress have no intention of solving the energy problem or the economic one either.  Their intention, as outlined by Rahm Emmanuel, is to make our crisis as large as possible, thus allowing them to usher in socialistic and totalitarian policies under the guise of environmentalism.  These will meet little resistance since the American people will be open to anything to get them out of their predicament.  This is the way Mussolini and Hugo Chavez have done it in the past.  This will allow Obama and the far left liberals in the Democrat Party to enact the &quot;CHANGE&quot; that they desire.  THE CHANGE TO FASCISM!!  I use &quot;fascism&quot; instead of &quot;socialism&quot; as fascism is the socializing of a single nation where socialism implies a worldwide ideology.  Mussolini and Hitler found that men wouldn&#039;t die for socialism but they would for a fascist Italy or Germany and apparently Hugo Chavez, with his ties to the Russian Navy, has figured out the same thing. 
     So don&#039;t expect the government to open up the restrictions on nuclear or drilling even for natural gas.  Saul Alinsky and Marx have taught Obama too well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#039;t seem to understand.  Obama and the Democrat Congress have no intention of solving the energy problem or the economic one either.  Their intention, as outlined by Rahm Emmanuel, is to make our crisis as large as possible, thus allowing them to usher in socialistic and totalitarian policies under the guise of environmentalism.  These will meet little resistance since the American people will be open to anything to get them out of their predicament.  This is the way Mussolini and Hugo Chavez have done it in the past.  This will allow Obama and the far left liberals in the Democrat Party to enact the &quot;CHANGE&quot; that they desire.  THE CHANGE TO FASCISM!!  I use &quot;fascism&quot; instead of &quot;socialism&quot; as fascism is the socializing of a single nation where socialism implies a worldwide ideology.  Mussolini and Hitler found that men wouldn&#039;t die for socialism but they would for a fascist Italy or Germany and apparently Hugo Chavez, with his ties to the Russian Navy, has figured out the same thing.</p>
<p>     So don&#039;t expect the government to open up the restrictions on nuclear or drilling even for natural gas.  Saul Alinsky and Marx have taught Obama too well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Gray South Ca</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/#comment-9923</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Gray South Ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/#comment-9923</guid>
		<description>Artical, 
  A new regulatory structure is necessary, but requires careful thought, planning and vetting prior to implementation. The most critical and needed component however, is a &#8220;lessons learned analysis&#8221;. This also has not been discussed, but discussions should begin soon, and should have been a part of the TARP bill. 
 
   A cogent and comprehensive analysis of the elements of causation including government individuals, elected officials, regulatory agencies, must be investigated and fully examined for their contributions and / or possible malfeasance that caused this debacle. This must be outside of the Congress and completely objective 
================================================================================================ Coment, 
 
 
   These two proposed programs may { critical } be applied to the advancement of affordable electricity.  there is an ongoing battle over who decides what energy sources are to be used to make electricity to know what partys are working for affordable electricity or not. 
 
  The sub prime loan bundled,,,rated,,,insured,,,and resold,,,  &quot;&quot;&quot;debacle&quot;&quot;&quot;  was caused by among a few others two things,  the government &quot;&quot;&quot;elected officials&quot;&quot;&quot;  1,  changed government regulations to promote such loans,,, 2,  the banks,,,  and in some cases were forced by government mandate to make such loans made THE loans. 
 
                                                                                                                                                             Tom. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artical,</p>
<p>  A new regulatory structure is necessary, but requires careful thought, planning and vetting prior to implementation. The most critical and needed component however, is a &ldquo;lessons learned analysis&rdquo;. This also has not been discussed, but discussions should begin soon, and should have been a part of the TARP bill.</p>
<p>   A cogent and comprehensive analysis of the elements of causation including government individuals, elected officials, regulatory agencies, must be investigated and fully examined for their contributions and / or possible malfeasance that caused this debacle. This must be outside of the Congress and completely objective</p>
<p>================================================================================================ Coment,</p>
<p>   These two proposed programs may { critical } be applied to the advancement of affordable electricity.  there is an ongoing battle over who decides what energy sources are to be used to make electricity to know what partys are working for affordable electricity or not.</p>
<p>  The sub prime loan bundled,,,rated,,,insured,,,and resold,,,  &quot;&quot;&quot;debacle&quot;&quot;&quot;  was caused by among a few others two things,  the government &quot;&quot;&quot;elected officials&quot;&quot;&quot;  1,  changed government regulations to promote such loans,,, 2,  the banks,,,  and in some cases were forced by government mandate to make such loans made THE loans.</p>
<p>                                                                                                                                                             Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quantumfoam/townvill</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/#comment-9850</link>
		<dc:creator>quantumfoam/townvill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/11/25/wind-suppliers-are-paying-people-to-take-their-energy/#comment-9850</guid>
		<description>You guys just make too much sense. The democrats will probably put you on their hit list. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys just make too much sense. The democrats will probably put you on their hit list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

