• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • New Obama Style Suits AP

    Here’s one that’s a little hard even for media folks to figure. Out of the blue, the Associated Press quietly issued a new style rule that took effect at 3 a.m. Nov. 14. As a result of this 3 a.m. call, the AP will sound a more formal tone when referring to the president of the United States for the first time in its news reports.

    No more “President Bush this” or “President Bush that” when AP copy in America — whether written for broadcast, print or online — initially mentions the holder of the nation’s highest office.

    What the style change we can believe in really means, as of Barack Obama’s inauguration Jan. 20, is: “President Obama this” or “President Obama that” won’t be good enough. Too traditional.

    News organizations affiliated with AP — as well as the declining numbers of corporate and freelance scribes who look to the AP Stylebook as ultimate arbiter of style and usage — will be proper only if they write “President Barack Obama” when first mentioning the leader of the free world.

    Got that? First and last name, ladies and gentlemen of the mainstream media. And you know how they already love to call the president-elect simply “Barack.”

    “Well, there they go again,” critics will say. Those carping skeptics will glom on to this historic change as the latest example of the news media’s lovesick casting of Obama as an exceptional being.

    In what one AP reporter called a “cryptic” advisory Nov. 12 on the wire service’s Web site, AP media relations director Paul Colford wrote:

    The Associated Press is adopting a universal style for referring to all heads of state, including the United States. Effective Thursday at 3 a.m. EST, the AP will use the title and first and family names on first reference: President George W. Bush, not just President Bush; President-elect Barack Obama, not just President-elect Obama; President Nicolas Sarkozy, not just President Sarkozy.

    So, what the change actually represents is the media’s further discarding of American exceptionalism in favor of an international standard — a sort of global test, to use John Kerry’s memorable phrase. Despite the implication of the French example cited above, AP style until now had required first and last name on first reference for all heads of state except the American president.

    Sure, it took less space to print “President Roosevelt” than to print “President Franklin Delano Roosevelt” back in the day — when every inch of spare newsprint meant more room for news. More importantly, though, the quaint old style assumed Americans’ familiarity – by natural and national kinship, if you will — with their president. “In most cases, the first name of a current or former U.S. president is not necessary on first reference,” the AP Stylebook entry for “president” instructed.

    Now, though, AP stories will introduce the American president — a citizen of the world, after all – with the same formality with which the wire service treats other leaders of nations: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev — even North Korean dictator Kim Jung Il. No preconditions. (AP’s work for overseas markets already took this more formal approach to U.S. presidents.)

    Note, though, the new style rule for Obama will not include a middle initial — as in “President Barack H. Obama” — even though that’s the new rule for the sitting president, “President George W. Bush.”

    New York’s mediabistro.com cracked: “No doubt someone in the GOP was hoping for the whole shebang; namely that on first reference Obama would be President-elect Barack Hussein Obama, which come to think of it would be pretty awesome.”

    The postmodern AP, a 162-year-old cooperative owned by 1,500 daily newspaper members, nurtures a well-earned rep for striving to be politically correct. This is the wire that ruled “gay” to be “preferred over homosexual” and insisted on referring to illegal aliens as “illegal immigrants”– thus sullying the good name of immigrants.

    Tradition isn’t entirely against the AP style rules with the Obama ascendancy. It’ll still be “Obama,” just as it was “Bush,” in subsequent mentions in a story — what journalists call “second reference.”

    So no “Mr. Obama.” No “President Obama.” No “O Mighty Obama.” (Kidding.)

    Just plain ol’ Obama. Just like all those mere mortal presidents before him. Does that strike anyone as disrespectful?

    Posted in First Principles [slideshow_deploy]

    9 Responses to New Obama Style Suits AP

    1. LadyM South Carolina says:

      Instead of worrying about being politically correct in the manner that you address people, try telling the truth instead !!!

    2. Pingback: George Bush On Best Political Blogs » New Obama Style Suits AP

    3. Pingback: Election means new AP style rules « Copy-editing with a twist

    4. Pingback: President Story » Barack Obama Vying to Be Newst YouTube Sensation

    5. Roseanna Barrett says:

      I just commented on MediaBistro, too: After a year of "President Barack Obama" on first reference grating on my eyes in the papers, I finally decided to search for the apparent new style and found your site and Mr. McIntyre's essay. I'm shocked. As I said to MediaBistro, "Exactly which President Obama do they think we're talking about, that we need clarification?" The same goes for using "Mr." on subsequent reference. And yes, I do in fact consider it disrespectful! I don't think it's jingoistic to find it insulting to the man and the office. There's only one President of the United States; as they say, "He needs no introduction."

    6. Pingback: A Sense of Capital En-TITLE-ment | Grammar Guide | Part of the Freelance Writing Jobs Blog Network

    7. Bryan Keeling says:

      Yes, I do think it's disrespectful. I just read this article, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?stor… and was surprised that they weren't saying President Obama. I think they should always have the President. I mean…10 years from now…if someone is reading some article (and Time Mag. is even worse, not even saying President Obama at ALL)…who is going to even know they are talking about the president? It's like not putting a Dr. before someone's name who has earned the degree as Dr.. It's wrong…honestly, it just an excuse to be lazy in my book!

    8. Ken McIntyre KenMac55, Washington says:

      Belated thx for the recent comments, Roseanna and Bryan.

    9. BJ Lewis, Eagle Poin says:

      In response to my complaint to the local Medford OR NBC affiliate referring to President Obama as 'Mister Obama,' (albeit a 2nd reference) they replied:

      "….the AP Style Book which is the official document of how news is presented states that in first reference the President is mentioned with his title, after that in second and future references it is by Mr or simply the last name."

      I'm not a subscriber to the AP Style book but I question that any OK to any presidential reference of Mister is correct. Just plain Obama would be correct, although I agree, that sounds disrespectful.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×