• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Left's Big Deficit, Less Energy Plan for Millions of Low Paying Entry-Level Jobs

    Last week Heritage Senior Policy Analyst David Kreutzer wrote a WebMemo detailing the flaws of three recent enviro/leftist reports purporting to show that massive government interference in the energy sector would lead to millions of new jobs. The co-author of one of those studies, the Center for American Progress’ Robert Pollin has now issued a response:

    Kreutzer claims that “Green Recovery” is able to show that green investments produce positive job effects only by making an elementary error in logic. He claims we count the jobs that are created by spending a given amount of money, for example, $100, on green investments, but we ignore the jobs that are lost when $100 in new taxes have to be raised to pay for the green investments.

    Kreutzer reaches this conclusion by ignoring all the basic arguments in “Green Recovery.” Spending $1 million on green investments, for example, will create about 17 jobs within the U.S. economy, while spending that same amount within the oil industry will create about 4.5 jobs. As a short-term stimulus program—in which an increase in spending is not offset by any corresponding rise in taxes—a $1 million increase in spending on green investments will therefore produce 17 new jobs, with no job losses elsewhere in the economy.

    There are so many things wrong with this analysis, but we’ll start with just four:

    False Policy Choice – Pollin wants to frame the policy question as $100 in government spending for ‘green investments’ versus $100 in government spending for the petroleum industry. On what planet is that debate actually occurring? Here in the real world policy makers are debating whether to spend $150 billion over ten years to create 5 million new ‘green collar’ jobs. Pollin does refer to subsidies given to oil, but this is primarily an investment tax credit given to all manufacturing industries and is not unique to petroleum. Whether or not we want to repeal that tax credit for all manufacturers is a worthy but separate debate.

    Government Spending Not Free – By all appearances Pollin seems to live in a completely cost free world where the government can spend $1 million to create 17 new jobs without any repercussions anywhere else in the economy. How wonderful it would be if that were true! But why stop at just $1 million for a paltry 17 new jobs? According to the Department of Labor there are currently 9.5 million unemployed people currently in the United States. Since there are no consequences to increased government spending, why don’t we spend $5.5 trillion and put everyone to work in the “green collar” economy?

    Not All Jobs Created Equal – According to Pollin’s own report, the “green collar” jobs Pollin wants to create are “lower, entry-level jobs” that pay “about 20% less than the average for those connected to the oil industry.”

    Less Energy Produced – Also according to Pollin’s own report, “green collar” jobs produce less energy: “This would produce highly inflated employment figures for solar power and other forms of renewable energy, where, at present, the costs of generating a given supply of BTUs is much more expensive than traditional energy sources.

    As Kreutzer said in his original critique:

    Energy is a valuable input to the modern economy. Cutting CO2 makes less energy available, and when the impacts are traced through the economy, some jobs are created but more are lost. Counting only the jobs that are created distorts the analysis and invalidates the conclusions.

    When all is said and done, restricting CO2 cuts energy, income, and jobs. Pretending that breaking windows creates employment may make choosing among alternatives easier, but it leads to bad policy.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to The Left's Big Deficit, Less Energy Plan for Millions of Low Paying Entry-Level Jobs

    1. Barb -mn says:

      Whatever mankind has discovered in this world, is in this world to discover. As most people know the government's will to destroy capitalism is by fearing the people and their children of what the government calls "global warming" without factual evidence. Mandating unnecessary steps to diminish prosperity is as low and greedy as officials of the government can get in a FREE SOCIETY.

      Productive use of natural resources for the productive survival of mankind is not KILLING ANY ANIMAL OR HUMAN and shows NO EVIDENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING. For whatever destructive use of natural resources (mfg to use destructive weapons, etc) or defying nature (cloning, etc) has, is and will continue to destroy the earth and all that lives, as there is factual evidence of this.

      It is the government against the people as the government thinks they speak for the people yet the people only hear from the mouths of government. Quit wasting needless time and money.

      Necessary mandates already in place before the government's global warming uprise, are emitting less the pollution (factual evidence) and is all that is needed. People create much better jobs then the government of waste and no integrity.

      Government, your job is defined in the constitution stay out of private, honest businesses. You are overstaffed and factual evidence proves your worthlessness.

    2. Pingback: » The Left’s Big Deficit, Less Energy Plan for Millions of Low …

    3. Pingback: The Left’s Big Deficit, Less Energy Plan for Millions of Low … | debtrecruitment.com

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×