<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Founders and Redistribution of Wealth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Bryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-114853</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-114853</guid>
		<description>Most of the founders were opposed to slavery.  There was a long debate about slavery during the writing of the Constitution.  All but three of the states wanted to abolish slavery.  The other three refused to sign if slavery was abolished.  Those three states also wanted their slaves to count toward the number of congressmen they could have.  The anti-slavery states were of course opposed to this too, and even said they should be able to count their property (animals, etc) if those three states could count their property (the slaves).  As a compromise the practice of slavery was not banned outright.  The southern states were allowed to count their slaves for the purpose of how many congressmen they could have, but they were limited to just over 1/2. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the founders were opposed to slavery.  There was a long debate about slavery during the writing of the Constitution.  All but three of the states wanted to abolish slavery.  The other three refused to sign if slavery was abolished.  Those three states also wanted their slaves to count toward the number of congressmen they could have.  The anti-slavery states were of course opposed to this too, and even said they should be able to count their property (animals, etc) if those three states could count their property (the slaves).  As a compromise the practice of slavery was not banned outright.  The southern states were allowed to count their slaves for the purpose of how many congressmen they could have, but they were limited to just over 1/2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-92073</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-92073</guid>
		<description>That is all true. But before you think the Founders The Founders also were practitioners of one of the most brutal and oppressive social systems in human history--slavery. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is all true. But before you think the Founders The Founders also were practitioners of one of the most brutal and oppressive social systems in human history&#8211;slavery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Economics of Mere Conservatism: Part II &#171; A Voice in the Wilderness</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-88363</link>
		<dc:creator>The Economics of Mere Conservatism: Part II &#171; A Voice in the Wilderness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-88363</guid>
		<description>[...] property, and the property rights that logically spring forth from it, is the basis of economic, political, and religious freedom.  It gives the individual a vested interest, a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] property, and the property rights that logically spring forth from it, is the basis of economic, political, and religious freedom.  It gives the individual a vested interest, a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wealth Redistribution: Legal Plunder Or Just California Dreamin? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-52911</link>
		<dc:creator>Wealth Redistribution: Legal Plunder Or Just California Dreamin? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-52911</guid>
		<description>[...] The Founders and Redistribution of Wealth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Founders and Redistribution of Wealth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Aderholt</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-9275</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Aderholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-9275</guid>
		<description>We are going to a socialist government. Look at Cuba and see if this is what we need. I do not like the idea of spreding the wealth to all. It has been said that 20% of the people controll 80% of the money in the world, if all the money was divided up equal among all the people in the world, it will be only a short time before 20% of the people controll 80% of the money. Most people cna not and will not manage their money in a manner that will be benefical to them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are going to a socialist government. Look at Cuba and see if this is what we need. I do not like the idea of spreding the wealth to all. It has been said that 20% of the people controll 80% of the money in the world, if all the money was divided up equal among all the people in the world, it will be only a short time before 20% of the people controll 80% of the money. Most people cna not and will not manage their money in a manner that will be benefical to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thomas Jefferson On Wealth Redistribution</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-8048</link>
		<dc:creator>ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thomas Jefferson On Wealth Redistribution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-8048</guid>
		<description>[...]  He was against it before Barack Obama was for it. Never let it be said that Joe the Plumber doesn&#8217;t have backup for his very sensible position and concerns regarding wealth redistribution. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  He was against it before Barack Obama was for it. Never let it be said that Joe the Plumber doesn&#8217;t have backup for his very sensible position and concerns regarding wealth redistribution. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jefferson on Obama&#8217;s tax plan : Post-Ed Notes</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-7935</link>
		<dc:creator>Jefferson on Obama&#8217;s tax plan : Post-Ed Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-7935</guid>
		<description>[...] Thomas Jefferson on the redistribution of wealth: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thomas Jefferson on the redistribution of wealth: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Founders and Redistribution of Wealth - Jason&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-7917</link>
		<dc:creator>The Founders and Redistribution of Wealth - Jason&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/10/29/the-founders-and-redistribution-of-wealth/#comment-7917</guid>
		<description>[...] Link: The Founders and Redistribution of Wealth  Posted in Shared Links at October 29th, 2008. Trackback URI: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: The Founders and Redistribution of Wealth  Posted in Shared Links at October 29th, 2008. Trackback URI: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

