• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Omnibus Land Package: More Energy Off Limits

    1082 pages.

    $3 billion in earmarks.

    At least 8.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 300 million barrels of oil off limits.

    Congress is at it again. In an attempt to squeeze an omnibus package during the lame-duck session, Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid said that beginning November 17th a debate over a public lands bill that includes 160 pieces of legislation will take place.

    The bill contains ridiculous earmarks such as $3.5 million to celebrate the 450th birthday of St. Augustine Florida in 2015 and $5 million on botanical gardens in Hawaii and Florida.

    Now, I’m as big of fan of botanical gardens as the next guy, but is this really how we should be allocating taxpayer dollars?

    Even more alarming is the more than 100 different land-grab bills (bills allowing federal government to take ownership of land) that would restrict access to valuable energy resources including oil shale areas. The reality is that the federal government already owns 650 million acres of land, including 85% of Nevada, 69% of Alaska, 57% of Utah, 53% of Oregon. Basically, the government owns the West.

    Strange Maps has a great map of the United States and the percentage of federally owned land here. Does the government really need more?

    An estimated 1.2 trillion to 1.8 trillion barrels of oil is available in the Green River Formation, an area which expands through most of Colorado and parts of Utah and Wyoming.  Although not all the land would not be taken by the government under the bill,  recoverable oil refined from oil shale would provide another resource for fuel production. According to the U.S. Department of Interior and Bureau of Land Management, a moderate estimate of 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from oil shale in the Green River Formation is three times greater than the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.

    Senator Reid recently tried to sneak an oil shale ban in a bill in the midst of the financial crisis. Bundling all the spending projects in an omnibus package makes it difficult for Senators to vote against it if it includes a project for their respective state. But Senator Tom Coburn is standing against it:

    Congress’ approval ratings are at an all-time low because the American people understand that never before in our nation’s history have the priorities of the United States Congress been more at odds with the priorities of the American people. The majority’s willingness to spend a week or more debating a lands bill loaded with frivolous projects and radical environmental provisions when we are facing our greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression is a case study in Congress’ misplaced priorities.”

    We should remember that, even though we are facing a financial crisis, energy prices are still high. I’ve posted this quote from our Senior Policy Analyst Ben Lieberman before, but it’s worth mentioning again:

    Good energy policy is easy to distinguish from bad energy policy: Good policy leads to more supplies of affordable energy, and bad policy leads to less.”

    We need as much supply as we can get and this bill is taking energy resources off the table. Only in Washington.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Omnibus Land Package: More Energy Off Limits

    1. Robert L., Katy, TX says:

      Yes, dirty Harry and his cronies are at it again. It truly seems that the Democrat "leadership" (there's an oxymoron) lives in a parallel universe. When I hear Pelosi on TV spouting some nonsense about "saving the planet" and blah,blah,blah..lattitude and longitude..blah, blah, blah.., I start to think, "puff, puff, give…right, Nancy"? This Congress is possibly the worst in U. S. history.

    2. Bill Avery says:

      If "the politicians" in Washington would start thinking what are the best interests for this nation and its people,

      get out of the pork business and self interests and remember that they can be replaced…..lets start going after our own oil and stop sending all the jobs out of this country….close the borders and so on, they should look at their approval rating and see that it is the lowest in our history. I wonder if they are proud to be Americans?

    3. Geophys55, Houston says:

      Bill Avery,

      Yes, I, for one, am proud to be an American. Your sentiments about how to go forward would best be served by the McCain administration. I have already voted for same. You should, too.

    4. ELIZABETH, FLORIDA says:

      WE CANNOT ALLOW OUR NATION TO GO UNDER DUE TO THE SORRY LEADERSHIP OF PELOSI AND REID. THIS WOMAN IS UNFIT TO LEAD.

      SHE IS A RICH SNOB.

      OUR NATION DESERVES TO USE ALL THE ENERGY RESOURCES THAT WE HAVE. IT IS NECESSARY FOR US ALL TO STAND.

    5. Mayme, NY says:

      Take all the pork there is and it is only 1% of the budget. If eliminated completely, it would be a drop in the bucket of our deficit. Most of the pork has gone to companies to help keep the economy going.

      Just who are you calling a Rich Snob? Remember, capitalism is great, and being wealthy is even greater!

    6. Barb -mn says:

      The rich snobs in government got rich off us. Those who capitalize work to earn it. Equal Opportunity doesn't mean it's going to be equal to achieve. We're all different. Everybody had freedom to their own steps to take, to reach their own destination.

    7. Pingback: MoConservativePatriot.com » Gulf Oil Spill and the Quid-pro-quo of Policy

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×