• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama Undercuts America's Relationship With Colombia

    Free trade has been receiving a bad rap lately. Barack Obama’s campaign has come out in full force against free trade. In addition to clumsily saying he would unilaterally renegotiate NAFTA (much to the chagrin of Canada and Mexico), during the third presidential debate Obama voiced opposition to the Colombian free trade agreement under the guise of “human rights.”

    Colombia’s President Alvaro Uribe at the White House, Sept. 20, 2008

    Yet according to a recent editorial in the Wall Street Journal, labor union members, the contingent against whom human rights abuses have been aggressively exercised, are now much safer under Alvaro Uribe, Colombia’s president, whose approval ratings hover around 80%. From 2002 to 2007, the years in which Uribe has held office, the number of murders of union members has plummeted 87%. Is this not impressive progress worth encouraging with a trade agreement? Moreover, as John McCain pointed out, the United States already allows imports from Colombia. The agreement would open even more markets during strenuous economic times.

    In addition to snubbing the most staunch U.S. ally in the region, Obama asserted “there have not been prosecutions” of the murders of labor union members in 2006. Does Obama not know Uribe created a special investigative unit inside the attorney general’s office to handle union murders and that some 855 cases have open investigations, 179 security preventive detention measures have been issued, 61 cases are ready to be referred to court for trial, and 115 suspects have been convicted in 75 sentences? Clearly, he is either badly informed about the facts or pandering to the protectionist wing of his party.

    Many Latin American nations have begun implementing effective economic reforms and they should be encouraged with free trade agreements, not undercut by protectionist policies. One of the most significant ways in which to promote freer trade is to lower some of the world’s highest tariffs, especially those between developing countries — and most of Latin America fits that category. For the United States, the economic and political costs of reneging on trade agreements and renegotiating existing agreements are very high. To shortchange Colombia, our strongest ally in the region, would be to give credence to the antagonists in Latin America who assert that America cannot be trusted and would be a golden opportunity lost for increased investment and prosperity.

    Reopening NAFTA invites all kinds of additional costs detrimental to the economies to all parties involved; each would demand many changes and the costs would invariably increase for everyone. But would it create new jobs and bring manufacturers back to the U.S.? And what would it do to Mexico’s development and future prosperity?

    It is time that uncritical opposition to free trade ends. The economic bene­fits of free trade derive in part from the fact that trading partners have different competitive advantages. Free trade is fair when countries with those different advantages are able to trade with minimal restrictions and capitalize on those differences. Labor and environmental measures are hidden forms of protectionism and will inevitably have their costs for business, investors and the U.S. consumer.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Obama Undercuts America's Relationship With Colombia

    1. Pingback: Obama Undercuts America’s Relationship With Colombia

    2. Pingback: Still on the fence…

    3. Mike Vienna VA says:

      Obama probably consulted with his ally, Hugo Chavez on Columbian trade and how the US should approach..Come on! follow the money connect the dots………..

    4. Pingback: Colombia » Colombia quiere unir el Pacífico con Venezuela

    5. Stuart, Indiana says:

      Thanks for preaching the truth. The market will save us all. It will save the rainforest, it will stop global warming, and it will supply healthcare for workers. If we'd put cocaine on the free market, then the market would probably fight the War on Drugs for us. Clinton and his stupid Plan Colombia….

      Isn't the free market responsible for our current economic turmoil?, you ask. No. The Democrats, who want to stifle free trade with Colombia, created this crisis by pandering to Freddie Mac, and ACORN had a large hand in it by signing people on to toxic mortgage agreements. If we'd just cut the capital gains tax to zero, this would all go away.

      Praise the almighty market and His disciple, Milton Friedman.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.