• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • When Did 'Massive Voter Fraud' Become the New Standard?

    Is there any doubt ACORN has seriously undermined the credibility of elections in this country? Attempting to downplay the damage ACORN has done to the rule of law, the San Francisco Chronicle reports:

    Doug Chapin, director of electionline.org, a group that tracks election reform issues, said the skirmish over ACORN is part of a long-running battle between the parties, with Republicans demanding tougher rules on voter registration to prevent voter fraud and Democrats warning against efforts that could knock legitimate voters off the rolls.

    “ACORN has become a rope in the tug of war between the two parties over voter registration,” Chapin said.

    He said there’s little evidence to back up claims of massive voter fraud or voter suppression efforts this year.

    Since when did avoiding “massive voter fraud” become the new standard? In close elections it only takes small-scale vote fraud to subvert the will of the people. Is the left OK with that? Further in the piece, the Chronicle reports:

    Stephen Weir, the clerk-recorder and registrar of voters for Contra Costa County and the former president of the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials, said large voter registration drives often produce some false or duplicate registrations. But he noted that election officials have systems in place to make sure each voter is eligible.

    They might have these systems in place in California, but Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner (D-OH) sure doesn’t. Forced by a court order, Brunner revealed this week that almost one-third of all new voter registrations in Ohio this year (200,000 out of 666,000) may be fraudulent since they do not match federal databases.

    Thus the result of ACORN’s fraudulent vote drive in Ohio? Massive confusion on Election Day that will disenfranchise thousands of voters.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to When Did 'Massive Voter Fraud' Become the New Standard?

    1. Pingback: When Did ‘Massive Voter Fraud’ Become the New Standard?

    2. Barb- st. paul says:

      Since when did avoiding ‘massive voter fraud’ become the new standard? Since democrats became the majority. It would be patriotic if every government official who takes the name democrat and INCLUDING rinos, took a pay cut or removed themselves from a governing democracy. Race based programs created by democrats are NOT BENEFITS TO ALL EQUALLY which based on race do not show equality and are unnecessary expensive and need not be allowed. Democrat and rino corruption is destroying this country! Exposing people as WEAK instead of building STRENGTH and individual responsibility to the individuals of whom all have an equal chance at SUCCESS but who aren't willed to take the proper steps is the result of TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT.

    3. Jenna, Indiana says:

      This organization is a joke!! You are conservative idealogs that can't steal this one. You suck!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.