• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Regulations of Mass Job Destruction

    Bloomberg is reporting Barack Obama “will classify carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant that can be regulated.” As we have reported repeatedly in the past, such a decision would trigger numerous regulatory actions pursuant to the Clean Air Act and empower the Environmental Protection Agency to centrally plan the entire economy.

    Since the EPA published its proposed carbon capping plan this summer, the Heritage’s Center for Data Analysis has been using the widely respected Global Insight’s U.S. Macroeconomic Model of the American economy to estimate the economic impacts of CO2 regulations. CDA’s report is not yet finalized, but so far it has found that a decision by a future administration to regulate carbon pursuant to the Clean Air Act would:

    • Reduce aggregate gross domestic product by $6.9 trillion by 2029.
    • Reduce employment in the manufacturing sector by 2.9 million jobs by 2029.
    • Reduce employment in:
      • Mining by 7.4%;
      • Transportation and warehousing by 17%;
      • Durable manufacturing by 28%;
      • Textile mills by 28%;
      • Paper and paper products by 36%;
      • Plastics and rubber products by 54%;
      • Machinery manufacturing by 57%.

    The study measures only the likely impacts through 2029, at which point CO2 will have been cut by 31% below the 2005 level. The ultimate CO2 reduction target will likely exceed 70% by 2050. This will add much more to the total economic burden of the regulation.

    Tell the EPA what you think of their carbon capping plans here.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Regulations of Mass Job Destruction

    1. Pingback: Regulations of Mass Job Destruction | The Gaia Resource

    2. Pingback: Institute for Energy Research » Blog Archive » Regulating CO2 Under the Clean Air Act—Not the Kind of Change We Have Been Waiting For

    3. Thomas Gray, South C says:

      Energy Plan. Draft.

      Solar and wind are currently being manufactured useing FF and thus the cost must increase to provide these products,, IF we use atom power to manufacture these products we will not be dependant on outside energy support that many now realize we are critically dependent on today.

      At the least we are going to need some diplomicy if we cannot vote down carbon caps. I think they will become a lesser issue as all manufacturing / transportation begins a forced decline and the ensuing job losses that we are now seeing.


    4. Guy Arnold says:

      CO2 is used in so many things we utilize in life the EPA will kill ouir national defence if CO2 is removed from out industrial use in the USA.


    5. Pingback: The Costs of Regulating CO2 Under the Clean Air Act | Energy-Crisis.Org

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.