• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Health Benefits Are Part of Worker Pay

    George Mason University economics professor Don Boudreaux writes a letter to The Washington Post correcting columnist E.J. Dionne’s mistaken defense of Barack Obama’s health care plan:

    According to E.J. Dionne, “Few investments would help businesses more than offloading a share of their health-care costs to the government. It’s social justice with an economic kick” (“Hoover vs. Roosevelt?” October 10). Overlooking the questionable “justice” of forcing Peter to pay Paul’s insurance premiums, Mr. Dionne’s economics is wrong.

    Government provision of universal health insurance won’t reduce employers’ costs of employing workers. Worker pay – wages and benefits – is set by competition among employers for employees. If competition obliges Acme Inc. to pay a worker an hourly wage of $20 plus health benefits worth $5 hourly, this fact means that Acme must pay this worker a total-compensation package of $25 per hour. Because government provision of all health insurance would not reduce the value of this worker to Acme and other potential employers, competition would oblige Acme to raise the worker’s hourly wage by $5 – the amount that Acme no longer must pay for health-insurance premiums. Acme would still have to pay this worker a total-compensation package worth $25 per hour.

    Contrary to Mr. Dionne’s assumption, government provision of universal health insurance would not reduce firms’ costs — although it would surely raise their taxes.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Health Benefits Are Part of Worker Pay

    1. Gene Laabs says:

      In addition to the certainty of increased taxes on the firm is the increase in prices to the consumer of the firms product or service. All firms (business')pass their tax burden to customers in their prices. Any talk about increasing Corp. taxes by politicians is nothing more then a scam! That or they don't know enough to be trusted with public office!!

    2. Mike, Cleveland, OH. says:

      While I agree with professor Boudreaux's general thesis, I am not sure that the value of the worker (as discerned by the worker) is the $25.00 per your example. The cost of the worker to the company is the sum of all costs, i.e., wages + benefits; however the laborer see his value as the hourly wage, less deductions for taxes, insur., etc…

      Having said that, it is unrealistic to believe that burden can be eliminated for the cost of insurance. One of the immutable physical laws is: matter can not be created or destroyed… by that I mean cost is cost and it does not simply disappear by moving to another column on a ledger. The cost of insurance is a cost period. Whether it is paid by individual, company, or gov't, it is a cost, and truly can not be hidden. Ultimately, this cost is on the company,and then the individual (whether labor or consumer).

    3. Pingback: Mistakes That Could Put You in Medical Debt

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×