• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Legal Phalanx Between Americans and Energy Freedom

    Last week the House of Representatives approved a funding bill that reversed a quarter-century ban on drilling for oil off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. While this is a major victory for American consumers, it is only the beginning. The left and their environmental allies have constructed a massive web of bureaucracy between America’s natural resources and American consumers. The Institute for Energy Research has detailed the cumbersome and inefficient process energy producers must go through before a drop of oil or a cubic foot of natural gas can be produced:

    Step 1: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) Prepares a 5-Year Leasing Program

    MMS, a part of the Department of the Interior, regulates the OCS under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA). Section 18 of OCSLA requires MMS to adopt a 5-year leasing program which describes the scheduled lease sales for a 5-year period, along with policies pertaining to the size and location of sales and the receipt of fair-market value. To develop the five-year program, MMS takes the following steps:

    1. Publishes a Request for Comment and Information in the Federal Register
    2. 45-day Comment Period (the comment period closed last week on MMS’s new 5-year plan starting in 2010)
    3. Publishes a Draft Proposed Program in the Federal Register
    4. 60-day Comment Period
    5. Publishes a Proposed Leasing Program and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Published in the Federal Register
    6. 90-day Comment Period
    7. Publishes a Proposed Final Leasing Program and Final Environmental Impact Statement in the Federal Register
    8. 60-day Period in which Congress can object
    9. 5-year Program Announced

    This process usually takes 18-36 months to complete. In the case of offshore exploration on the West and East coasts, it is likely the process will take longer than 36 months. First, environmental special interest groups would likely sue MMS on the Environmental Impact Statements. Environmental Impact Statements are especially lawsuit prone because the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) calls for “a detailed statement” on the environmental impacts of an action and alternatives to that action. These “detailed statements” now run thousands of papers because over time, judges have added to the list of things that need to be studied in the Environmental Impact Statement.

    Second, while Congress may allow the moratorium to expire at the end of September, there will likely be a fight during the 60-day period in which Congress can object to a final leasing plan.

    Step 2: MMS Conducts Actual Lease Sales

    The 5-year leasing plan selects broad areas in which MMS will offer leases. After MMS completes the 5-year plan, the next step is to go through the process of selecting the actual lease areas and offering the leases for sale. To conduct actual lease sales, MMS takes the following steps:

    1. Publishes Request for Information in the Federal Register
    2. 45-day comment period
    3. Defines proposed sale area
    4. Publishes Environmental Impact Statement for the specific sale
    5. 60-day comment period

    [Steps 6-11 occur concurrently]

    1. Publishes Final Environmental Impact Statement
    2. 30-day period
    3. Publishes Proposed Notice of Sale
    4. 60-day period
    5. Sends a Consistency Determination (as required by the Coastal Zone Management Act) to Governors of affected states
    6. 90-day period
    7. Publishes notice of actual sale
    8. 30-day period
    9. Sale
    10. Leases issued

    If everything goes well, this entire process from the request for information to the actual sale may take two or more years. But as with the development of the 5-year plan, there are many ways to slow down the process, especially through litigation. For example, earlier this year environmental special interest groups sued to stop a lease sale on the Chukchi Sea. Environmental activists would likely sue on all new lease sales on the West and East Coast, slowing down any new energy production.

    Step 3: Energy Companies Work to Produce Oil and Natural Gas

    After MMS has produced a 5-year plan and carried out the lease sales, it will still take time for energy companies to explore and start producing oil (unless the lease sales are offered offshore of California where we already know where some resources are).

    Here is some of the typical activities that need to occur for an energy company to produce energy:

    • Gather seismic data and evaluate

    • Conduct shallow hazards survey

    • Partner with new companies; spread risk

    • File for approval of exploration plan—NEPA review

    • Drill well (60–180 days)

    • Assess prospect

    • Gather seismic data and evaluate

    • Drill additional wells

    • Decide to proceed with development; obtain partner commitment

    • File development plan/pipeline approval—NEPA review

    • Structural engineering review by MMS

    (with a major project–2 year period to construct/fabricate production facility/ transport from overseas)

    • Structural engineering review by MMS

    • Pre-production inspection by MMS (and Coast Guard)

    • Transport to site and hook-up (2–6 months)

    • Production approval by MMS

    • First production

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to The Legal Phalanx Between Americans and Energy Freedom

    1. Della Martin, Clover says:

      I understand that few Americans relish the idea of any government entity looking over their shoulder every minute of the day but it seems to me that SOMEBODY should be shouting from the rooftops about these kinds of red-tape snarls which only delay progress in many areas, not only energy. What about entitlements? Just have more kids so they can take care of their elders like some third world country? (In that same vein, reducing the illegal immigration and its drain on our economy won't solve all our problems but it would sure be a tangible start!) Or what about the out-sourcing of our jobs? We're making other countries rich while our infrastructure suffers and our obligations, both at home and abroad, just keep deteriorating. Someone needs a BIG bullhorn!

    2. Pingback: Morning Bell: Economy Needs Natural Resource Development Now

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×