• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Addressing the Credit Rescue's Constitutional Problems

    Former Attorney General Ed Meese and Heritage ‘s Dr. Stuart Butler make their case for a financial rescue plan:

    While there are those in Congress who would push the role of government far beyond what is necessary in this crisis, the core technical parts of the negotiated package are acceptable. Important protections for taxpayers have been added to the original plan. And while some questionable and potentially counterproductive features have also been added, other egregious proposals—such as enormous handouts to activist housing groups—were stripped away during the negotiations. Taken together, the main financial measures are likely to accomplish the goal, and the unwise measures are sufficiently limited to warrant passage.

    Certain provisions are far more troubling, however, and raise serious constitutional concerns. Specifically:

    1. The legislation grants extraordinary powers to the Treasury secretary without providing sufficiently specific direction. The legislation still simply gives the secretary a functional “blank check” of authority rather than sufficient legislative direction as to what constitutes permissible action.
    2. The oversight board contains members not directly subject to or removable by the President, which raises substantial concerns of abrogating the President’s authority under Article II and makes the entire structure thereby less democratically accountable.

    Both concerns could be (and should be) remedied, first by providing greater guidance and guidelines to the secretary regarding his new authority—sufficient that a reasonable person would be able to determine what acts would be lawful and which acts undertaken by the secretary would be unlawful—and second, ideally, by either removing the oversight board entirely or limiting its role to an advisory one.

    Thus serious constitutional concerns remain and should be addressed in putting together a statute to deal with this current and hopefully temporary credit emergency. The constitutional questionability of some provisions is worrying, as is the centralization of power. Nonetheless, the situation is so grave that we must take unusual measures now and accept some negotiated arrangements that remain very troubling, provided they are limited in extent and time and are not accepted as a permanent part of our government.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Addressing the Credit Rescue's Constitutional Problems

    1. Diane Menninga says:

      Just another example of the government wanting total and complete control while "We The People"

      pay for their mistakes. We are headed down a long dark road. Is this America or Germany?

    2. Marcus Mateus, Austi says:

      I am so disappointed to see the Heritage Foundation supporting a government bailout, much less expanding government powers.

      Letting the markets reprice assets and reallocate capital may be quite painful in the short-term, but artificially propping up prices and hindering market corrections (as pretty much any bailout would) will simply make the process a long-slow bleed… and ultimately more painful both in terms of our economy and our liberty.

    3. Pingback: Pages tagged "dire"

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×