• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: Toward a More Resilient Nation

    This evening John McCain and Barack Obama will appear together (but speak separately) as part of a nationally televised forum at Columbia University in Manhattan. The two presidential candidates have promised to set aside politics to commemorate the seventh anniversary of the 9/11 attacks and will instead lay out their personal visions on civic engagement and service. The candidates’ call for unity on this day is admirable, but the chosen topic of the event is also yet another missed opportunity for the American people to hear about how each candidate plans to protect our country from future attacks and disasters.

    Energy, taxes and federal spending are all important issues that deserve the candidates time, but the candidates have devoted almost no time to discussing their vision for improving homeland security. Despite this lack of attention, Americans still face threats from abroad (where al Qaeda has reconstituted itself in the border regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan) and at home (another hurricane is bearing down on Texas and California).

    Seven years after 9/11 and more than five years after its creation, the Department of Homeland Security is afflicted with high turnover and low morale. It has turned into a political football that answers to 86 different congressional committees and subcommittees (by contrast, the Department of Defense answers to only 36 committees, and six of those handle 80% of the oversight). Too much attention is focused on DHS, which ought to be only one part of a much larger homeland security system that includes not just federal agencies like the the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Justice, Energy and State, but also state and local governments.

    Due to its sheer size and growing population, the United States has many vulnerabilities. Spending billions to protect infrastructure does not make the nation invulnerable. It is impossible to protect every target, and a strategy predicated on protection is bound to fall short. For too long the federal government has been designating more and more items as “critical” infrastructure. If everything is critical, nothing is critical. Instead, the next administration should pursue a strategy of resiliency. Heritage senior research fellow James Carafano explains: “[R]esiliency promises something much more achievable and important: sustaining society amid known threats and unexpected disasters. Indeed, the more complex the society and the more robust the nature of its civil society, the more it should adopt a strategy of resilience.”

    Toward this end, Carafano recommends:

    • Establishing improved public-private models for risk management that define reasonable roles for government and industry.
    • Encouraging bilateral cooperation to address liability issues.
    • Developing national and international forums for increasing collaboration.
    • Innovating to pave the way for resilient public infrastructure in the 21st century.

    As we remember those we lost seven years ago, it is also a good time to reflect on what we can do better to protect all Americans from tomorrow’s threats, both natural and man-made. Hopefully, we’ll hear both candidates address these issues soon.

    Quick Hits:

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Morning Bell: Toward a More Resilient Nation

    1. Ken Jarvis - Las Veg says:

      "Japan has joined the European Union in raising tariffs on U.S. manufactured goods thanks to legislation sponsored by Sens. Robert Byrd (D-WV) and Sherrod Brown (D-OH)."

      I thought BuSh was Prez.

      What happened to – "The Buck Stops here"?

    2. Ken Jarvis - Las Vegas says:

      THIS IS WHAT HF WROTE = “Sharp increases in government spending will help drive the federal budget deficit to a near-record $407 billion when the budget year ends later this month.
      WSJournal – 9-10-08 -
      2008 – $407 Billion – will be more than double the deficit for 2007.

      BuSh in Jan 2004 pledged to cut th annual deficit, which was $412 in fiscal, in half within 5 years.

    3. Pingback: FROM THE MORNING BELL « Ragamuffin08’s Weblog

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.