• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Tapper Wrong, Palin Right on Fannie and Freddie

    This Saturday, Sarah Palin told a crowd in Colorado Springs, CO: “The fact is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers. The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help.”

    Now some in the press are claiming that this statement “puts her at odds with reality” on how Freddie and Fannie operate. However, it is the press, not Palin, that needs to take some “Fannie/Freddie lessons.

    For example, ABC’s Jake Tapper writes:

    They’re private entities.

    Though they’re private entities ultimately backed up by the taxpayers.

    But the only way Fannie and Freddie are “too expensive to the taxpayers” is if you’re talking about the bailout announced over the weekend.

    No Jake. Fannie and Freddie were never private entities. Fannie is a relic of the New Deal and Freddie was chartered by Congress in 1970. When Fannie was partially privatized, and since Freddie’s inception, both entities have benefited from an implicit federal guarantee of their outstanding obligations. If they were just ‘private entities’ as Tapper claims, they never would have been able to establish a massive duopoly in the U.S. mortgage market. Only because of their ‘government sponsored entity’ status were they able to lower their borrowing costs below what real ‘private entities’ had to pay.

    The only thing this weekend’s bailout did was turn an implicit promise into an explicit one. That’s it. Fannie and Freddie’s reckless participation in the subprime mortgage market have been making them “too expensive to the taxpayers” for years now.

    Unlike Tapper, Sarah Palin grasps this essential truth of the issue. She writes in the Wall Street Journal today:

    The bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is another outrageous, but sadly necessary, step for these two institutions. Given the long-term mismanagement and flawed structure of these two companies, this was the only short-term alternative for ensuring that hard-working Americans have access to affordable mortgages during this difficult economic period.

    We are strong advocates for the permanent reform of Fannie and Freddie. For years, Congress failed to act and it is deeply troubling that what we are now seeing is an exercise in crisis management rather than sound planning, and at great cost to taxpayers.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Tapper Wrong, Palin Right on Fannie and Freddie

    1. Paul says:

      Right on! We need to start reducing wasteful programs and spending now. The New Deal was wrong then and continuing these failed policies is wrong now.

    2. Rick Moss Boca Raton says:

      God Bless you for straightening out the insidious tangle of lies and deceitful half-truths that are proliferating thru the (in the tank) liberal news media outlets. The Heritage Foundation is truly a warm, beckoning light amidst the swirling storm of controversy we now face as a Nation!

    3. Gavo , Houston says:

      Your article does not refute the fact that PALIN WAS WRONG. She clearly said that they were too expensive to taxpayers when tax payers dont even pay for it. Your article does not speak to that fact. Freddie and Fannie are NOT funded by tax payers. Period. Palin indicated that it was. And she was wrong. Her comment simply shows her gross lack of knowledge of the subject.

    4. Lawliet, Greenville says:

      Sorry Gavo, but you're only hearing the part that you wish to hear. Tapper's comment actually refutes itself. If he was saying that Palin was wrong about the two mortgage companies being funded by taxes, why did he admit that Fannie May and Freddie Mac are ultimately financed by taxpayers? They have ALWAYS been financed by taxpayers.

    5. Ledru, Austin says:

      Gavo,

      Did you read the post? Fannie/Freddie were created by Congress, and were able to borrow at below market rates – they were subsidized by the Treasury. According to Fed research, this subsidy was to the tune of 20% of their bottom line. If the taxpayers were not paying for this difference then who was?

      The fact is that these entities were subsidized by the Federal Govt. and this cost taxpayer dollars.

      Period.

      http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2005/2005

    6. Lisa says:

      From the blog post:

      "When Fannie was partially privatized, and since Freddie’s inception, both entities have benefited from an implicit federal guarantee of their outstanding obligations."

      From Ledru's link:

      "Most purchasers of the GSEs’ debt securities believe that this debt is implicitly backed by the U.S. government despite the lack of a legal basis for such a belief and despite the fact that the prospectus for each GSE security clearly states that GSE debt is not backed by the government."

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×