The Heritage Foundation - Leadership for America

September 6, 2008 Darvin Dowdy, Houston, TX writes:

I disagree, Mr.Sherk. The Corn Ethanol Program has driven the world wide price of grain up considerably. Since the U.S. is the largest exporter of grain products in the world, the higher prices will eventually pull in massive amounts of foreign currency from abroad. This will feed a “growing” agri-business sector which will create solid, long-term jobs. High paying jobs.
The world population is pushing 7 billion and these folks have to eat. Many nations simply can’t produce the food needed for their own population. So they’ll turn to the U.S. farmer. The higher prices will lure the American Entrepreneur back to the land and they’ll produce the food that will be sorely needed over the next several decades.
Its about the Higher Prices, Mr. Sherk. The U.S. farmer must have these higher prices to motivate them. No one has done more to fill the worlds belly than the U.S. farmer and they should be paid very well for doing so. Or they won’t do it and there will be a world wide food shortage. So thank the Corn Ethanol Program for the much needed, much maligned higher prices. The Corn Ethanol Program must remain. DD

September 6, 2008 Carl, Alabama writes:

My opinion is that this country needs to be supplied by its own energy. We need to stop all natural resource depletion. Each and every person in this country has the ability to stop participating in the fossil fuel consumption. Turning to bio-fuels and ethanol is not the answer because making bio-fuels needs outragious amounts of fertilizer, and fertilizer is made from oil. So we are not doing anything but making higher food prices by making bio-fuels and not doing anything to eliminate our fossil fuel consumption.
http://www.goliath0825.com

September 7, 2008 Hilary Roemer, Nashville, TN writes:

I think that if the corn ethanol program continued, the country would become an unpleasant place to live in. I just try to think about the future.

September 7, 2008 Thomas Gray, South Carolina writes:

Mr Dowdy,,

I agree we should keep the mandates in place but for different reasons,, national security of basic transportation is critical in the event of a ww.

As a former TRUCK OWNER most people don’t realize just how far away much of the food they eat is grown and no matter what happens this food must be carried to market 300 million plus still must eat every day,

and now the days of cheap oil are over we must also change the way we power food transportation, and personal transportation,

The only energy source that I can see that is affordable is electricity to power electric motors for transportation both are proven to work well from trains to battery powered cars even battery powered bikes if one desires.

The grid for truck transport must yet be built and as I travil about I see it will be no small job but trucks will need live electricity to pull heavy loads or we can just wait until we have a supply interuption of oil or can no longer afford fuel oil and suffer mass famine and civil unrest.

electricity can be generated from various energy sources, I would like to see atom power put in place as a source becouse it’s afforable,,it’s clean,,and if i’m not mistaken can be used for well over one hundred years and in that length of time we may be able to truly put in place clean coal use. tom.