• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: Is Afghanistan Next?

    Democratic National Convention

    DENVER — Tonight former President Bill Clinton is supposed to deliver a speech on the official Democratic National Convention theme, “Securing America’s Future.” It is still unclear whether Clinton will stick to his assigned topic, or if he will go off message and defend his presidential legacy. Part of that legacy is the beginning of the online left, specifically MoveOn.org, which was created in 1998 to help defend Clinton from impeachment.

    MoveOn has since expanded its policy portfolio far beyond sexual harassment lawsuits, and its claimed 3.2 million members are now a major force in the party. They have been very active against the surge in Iraq, notoriously buying a full-page ad in the New York Times labeling Gen. David Petraeus, architect of our recent success, “General Betray Us.”

    But now that Iraq is becoming more and more peaceful every day, some of MoveOn’s members are shifting their focus to Afghanistan. Yesterday in The Big Tent, MoveOn executive director Eli Pariser said his membership was divided over what position to take on the direction of the war in Afghanistan. He said some still believe that the United States “can’t let the Taliban win” but he said growing numbers of his members believe “escalation is the wrong direction.”

    This position is at least consistent for MoveOn. After all, if a surge of troops is bad for Iraq, it has to be bad for Afghanistan, too. But progressives are also beginning to question if we should be in Afghanistan at all. Pariser explained that MoveOn’s members first opposed deposing Saddam Hussein because they believed it was “impossible to occupy Iraq without causing civil chaos.” But Afghanistan is just as hostile to foreign troops as Iraq. If the left believes force would never work in Iraq, why would it ever work in Afghanistan?

    After Barack Obama announced he wanted to send 10,000 more troops to Afghanistan, influential lefty blogger Juan Cole wrote:

    I don’t know whether Senator Obama really wants to try to militarily occupy Afghanistan even more than is now being attempted. I wish he would talk to some old Russian officers who were there in the 1980s first. … If the Afghanistan gambit is sincere, I don’t think it is good geostrategy. Afghanistan is far more unwinnable even than Iraq. If playing it up is politics, then it is dangerous politics. Presidents can become captive of their own record and end up having to commit to things because they made strong representations about them to the public. …

    Afghan tribes are fractious. They feud. Their territory is vast and rugged, and they know it like the back of their hands. Afghans are Jeffersonians in the sense that they want a light touch from the central government, and heavy handedness drives them into rebellion. Stand up Karzai’s army and air force and give him some billions to bribe the tribal chiefs, and let him apply carrot and stick himself. We need to get out of there.

    By the end of tonight we will know if Bill Clinton was able to stay on message and only talk about foreign policy. But what the left does next on national security is a completely different story. Progressives never like to talk about Clinton’s use of force around the world. Instead, they only talk about all the evil President Bush has done. If Obama becomes president, however, we just may see a MoveOn campaign pressuring him to get out of Afghanistan.

    Quick Hits:

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Morning Bell: Is Afghanistan Next?

    1. Frank Grundman says:

      If Senator Biden is under no obligation to recuse himself from participating in the passage of a bill that may directly benefiting his son's law firm, and not even obliged to disclose the family relationship to such participation, there is something seriously lacking in the ethics rules for the U. S. Senate.

    2. Glenn Steiding Pinol says:

      We need to start a serious oposition orginization called "MoveOverMoveOn.Net"

    3. Pingback: territory war online

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.