• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: Bringing Accountability Back to Transportation Funding

    The steep rise in gas prices has had a dramatic impact on American driving habits. According to Federal Highway Administration data, this May marked the seventh consecutive month that Americans drove fewer miles this year than the year before. Americans drove almost 10 billion fewer miles in May 2008 than they did in May 2007. That 3.7% drop in miles driven means less gas tax revenue for the federal Highway Trust Fund, which Transportation Secretary Mary Peters says is expected fall $3.1 billion short of its fiscal 2009 budget.

    As if high gas prices were not hitting Americans hard enough, the highway fund shortfall comes at a time when the United States is in desperate need for better infrastructure spending. In 2005, traffic delays wasted 4.2 billion hours of Americans’ time. The Federal Highway Administration estimates that congestion cost Americans $78.2 billion. Our infrastructure problem did not pop up over night. It has grown over many decades due to misplaced priorities and a lack of accountability. Now that the Highway Trust Fund is in peril, it is time for a complete transformation of our transportation funding system.

    One of the biggest problems voters face in trying to control transportation policy is finding the right official to hold accountable. Throughout the nation, there are always a large number of overlapping government transportation bodies at the local, state and federal levels that spend transportation funds. With so many actors in the arena, it is next to impossible for voters to hold these public entities accountable for failures. In Northern Virginia alone, transportation bureaucracies include the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, the National Park Service, the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission, the Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission, the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, and the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Talk about a need for less government.

    Worse still, more and more, Congress is getting involved. Transportation policies ought to be done on a regional basis and respond to the needs of the motorists and truckers who pay the taxes that benefit the system. But thanks to the recent explosion of congressional earmarks, privileged constituencies that pay the best lobbyists are the ones who have their needs met. The most recent highway bill had a record 7,000 earmarks, including an effort to federalize the nation’s sidewalks. This is the wrong direction for transportation policy.

    As Heritage Senior Research Fellow Ron Utt writes, “a much more productive approach would be to ‘turn back’ the federal highway program to the states.” Utt explains: “A turnback plan would eliminate the federal middleman by empowering the states to collect the federal fuel tax and use it to meet the transportation priorities of their own choosing.” States must also then work to streamline the number of bureaucracies within their jurisdictions so that voters can better hold officials accountable.

    Quick Hits:

    Posted in Energy, Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Morning Bell: Bringing Accountability Back to Transportation Funding

    1. Bud Miller, Alexandr says:

      The Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) essentially voted itself out of existence in July.

      Click on this link for more details regarding this failed "Authority":


    2. Vicki Eilenberger, L says:

      Poor, poor Nancy P. The power trip is up, sweetheart. You are a liar and a manipulator.You aren't trying to 'save our planet' you are trying to control more of our lives. Nancy, Nancy, I feel sad for you because now you may have to get a real job and earn real money and pay real taxes and live in the real world like the rest of us bourgeois. Maybe you should get on the "Dr. No" train. He's a man with values and a sense of responsibilty to his countrymen.

    3. Norm Terry, VIera FL says:

      My question is, how can 37% of military or former military persons even consider Obama for anything?

    4. Joe Lamb,Texas says:

      Hey Norm, they don't. Where did you get these numbers, the DNC?


      If this article is saying the emphasis in the DOT is in the wrong place, then, yes, they should be able to account for every cent.

      There should be accountability in every department. Hold their feet to the fire.


      There is too much methane coming from DC. Each member of government should have a plastic tank like the ones put on cows to trap gas. Methane also comes from the swamp that DC has become. It is time to drain the swamp. Get the rotten corruption out.

    5. Tom Till, McLean, VA says:

      Tom Till, McLean, VA

      Until the current policy development effort of the Bush Administration's Transportation Department under Secretaries Mineta and Peters, the federal government had failed, in the years since the creation of the Interstate Highway System in 1956, to develop an integrated strategy for the U.S. transportation system. The 7,000 earmarks of SAFETEA-LU give testimony to the Congress's focus on pork-barrel minutiae designed to get themselves re-elected rather than providing an effective, economical strategy for maintaining and expanding the Nation's transportation system. The Administration's proposals, are not designed "to systematically reduce the federal participation in infrastructure," to quote Representative Blumenauer (D-OR). Rather, these new proposals are designed to substitute a strategic approach that will bring rational economics, state and regional accountability, and effective methods of system and project financing for an obsolete federal program structure that has become a millstone around the neck of the Nation's transportation sector.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.