• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Tapping A Bad Idea By Tapping The Strategic Petroleum Reserve

    Tapping the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is an energy solution for politicians who are not serious about real energy solutions, but H.R 6578 seeks to do just that.

    Entitled The Consumer Energy Supply Act – in case you hadn’t noticed, truth in advertising laws don’t apply to the names of energy bills – the bill would tap 70 million barrels of oil from the 700 million SPR in an attempt to flood the market and bring prices down. It would add it back at a later time.

    This is bad policy, for two reasons. For one thing, the SPR was created to deal with an emergency that cuts off oil supplies, and not as a means of flooding the market in times of high prices. Oil removed for non-emergency reasons won’t be there should a true emergency arise. And, as a practical matter, the amounts at issue are far too small to make gas noticeably cheaper for an appreciable length of time. Further, any downward pressure on prices now would be followed by equal and opposite upward pressure when the amounts are added back to the SPR. For reasons that are not entirely clear, the bill requires that the oil added back be of a lower quality than the oil taken out, but the fact remains that this is a zero sum charade.

    But supporters of this bill have inadvertently highlighted a real solution. If, as proponents claim, the amounts of oil this bill seeks to take from the SPR are sufficient to make a difference in the price at the pump, then the far greater amounts of additional supply from off-limits areas like Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (approximately 10.4 billion barrels, or nearly 150 times the 70 million barrels in this bill), and the 85 percent of America’s territorial waters that are off limits (approximately 19 billion barrels, or 270 times the amount in this bill) should really do the trick. Granted, unlike the SPR this energy won’t be available right away, but if tapping the SPR could make any difference at all now, then increased domestic production could make a much bigger difference in the years ahead.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Tapping A Bad Idea By Tapping The Strategic Petroleum Reserve

    1. Adrian, Indiana says:

      'Truth in Advertising' aside, your article should have more truth in reporting! ANWR will provide 2.6 billion barrels as the mean production assumption, 4.3 in the high assumption and 1.9 in the low production assumption… over 12 years (2018 to 2030), according to the DOE. That is less fuel produced in 1 year than the US uses in a day. Ditto for the continental shelf production. Production costs from both of these areas are well above those of the Persian Gulf. Why are we trying to get blood from a rock? We should be better preparing ourselves for a hydrocarbon free future, and that will entail a painful transition, now or later.

    2. Darvin Dowdy, Houst says:

      If liberals want "painful transitions" then they should refrain from calling a doctor next time they're passing gallstones. Just endure it.

      As for the rest of us who enjoy life, we make no apologies for finding, drilling, pumping and using a God given resource: Oil. A product of Nature. And a safe product. No solid proof that oil is hurting our environment. We should pump and sell as much of it as possible while it still has value. Simultaneously developing other forms of energy. DD

    3. Joshua W. Delano, Br says:

      For a short term solution it is fine, but politically there needs to be some backroom quid pro quo here. A little of this for the Dems, and in turn let us have a gas tax holiday for the rest of the year, and likewise loosen up drilling restrictions even if it is only regionally per year, session, and/or as needed. We need to toss politics on it's rear and start taking this step by step and get something done.

      Joshua W. Delano
      http://www.JoshuaWDelano.Blogspot.com

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×