• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Good Luck, CFTC

    Liberals in Congress are desperate to head off the growing consensus for increased domestic oil production. Trying to convince her fellow Democrats not to cave in and allow oil exploration and production off the coast of California, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-NY) explained: “This is our ethanol.

    As persuasive as that argument is, liberals are desperate to pass anything that they can use to try and trick the American people into thinking they want to reduce gas prices. One bill that has passed the House and is heading to the floor of the Senate directs the Commodity Futures Trading Corporation (CFTC): “to utilize all its authority, including its emergency powers, to curb immediately the role of excessive speculation in any contract market … that is causing major market disturbances that prevent the market from accurately reflecting the forces of supply and demand for energy commodities.”

    Heritage fellow JD Foster details why this approach is fundamentally flawed:

    This legislation would make sense under some circumstances, none of which are present. For example, one would have to distinguish between excessive speculation and non-excessive speculation and between unwarranted changes in prices and warranted changes in price. In both cases, all one can wish the CFTC is “good luck.”

    Where the legislation best demonstrates its flawed approach is in the presumption that any and all relevant and “excessive” speculation is occurring in markets within the jurisdiction of the CFTC. Congress should be aware that futures markets are part of the global financial system and that this trading activity can and does occur worldwide. So any limitation on speculative activity the CFTC might attempt to enforce would simply mean the activity would move offshore, helping to build up foreign capital markets to compete more effectively with U.S. markets.

    Foster also notes that the Democrats evil “speculator” approach to lowering energy prices has been rejected by a wide consensus of thinkers including Paul Krugman, Robert Samuelson, the editors of The Economist, Sebastian Mallaby, and The New Yorker’s James Surowiecki.

    Foster concludes:

    Congress must recognize that speculators play a vital role in the operation of financial markets and that financial markets are now fully global in scope, so efforts to restrict speculation will succeed in the United States only because the activity will shift entirely abroad. It should focus on improving the stability and strength of U.S. markets by, for example, reducing excessive regulation rather than destabilizing the markets with imprecise new regulations that would render U.S. financial markets even less competitive.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Good Luck, CFTC

    1. John Galczynski, Geo says:

      Given the negative slide of the US economy amid energy price increases and the increasing trillion dollar spending by the "r" party – now and projected, especially with FISA signed last week providing legal authority of the Bush Republicans and Obama Democrats to invade Iran, the 59 trillion dollar US debt (see US GAO) will provide opportunities to trade military exports for US debt while selling off the US business assets.

      Fortunately, Bob Barr, who is running for President in 2008 offers a method to return to growth of business by limiting both debt and federal government expenses. Conservatives have rallied in support of Bob Barr in the past and given the failures of the current administration and the lack of options offered by McCain or Obama could gain positive growth with the Libertarian candidate. This, especially, since the Bush administration has spoiled so much of the republican appeal.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×