Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


This Relationship Ought to Be So Over

Posted July 15th, 2008 at 10:48am in Ongoing Priorities 1 Print This Post Print This Post

Heritage scholar David John makes the case for splintering Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in light of their recent financial troubles. From the New York Post:

WITH the Treasury and Federal Reserve in effect promising to keep Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac afloat, the mortgage giants’ crisis seems to be over. But the fundamental cause is still there – and without fundamental reform, we may very well endure a repeat performance in a few years.

while private stockholders own both Fannie and Freddie, they’re really government creations that differ greatly from true private-sector companies. That’s why they’re allowed to dominate mortgage securitization – and also why Fannie and Freddie need close oversight to ensure that they remain solvent and compete fairly.

Fannie and Freddie are leftovers from an era when giant government entities seemed essential to achieving social goals. The fact that both were later privatized doesn’t change their essential nature as dominators of a market, rather than mere participants in it.

Congress should look at breaking up both. A larger number of smaller entities could compete with each other without artificially dominating the market. In other words, let’s bring real capitalism to the housing-securitization markets.

The new companies would be owned by private stockholders and overseen by a regulator with enough teeth to ensure that they’re safely run. They could be bought, merged or even go out of business without the potential disruption that this crisis caused. Most important, they wouldn’t have the potential to bring housing lending to a screeching halt, or potentially required multibillion-dollar taxpayer bailouts.

Tags: ,

One Response to “This Relationship Ought to Be So Over”

  1. Darvin Dowdy, Houston, TX on at said:

    Seems like neither the dems or Republicans have the stomach for doing what needs to be done. Or even talking about it. These two fake org’s need to be shut down, liquidated and auctioned off to the highest bidder. Lock/Stock/Barrel. People will, most likely, always want to buy real estate and those selling it will find/work a way for that to happen. Even if they have to do an owner finance. DD

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.