• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Nuclear at the Crossroad

    As we continue to chronicle the worldwide nuclear renaissance here on the Foundry and at The Heritage Foundation, it is important to note the outlier nations and the reasons for which they resist nuclear power.

    Europe draws nearly a third of its electricity from nuclear power and is likely to increase its supply of energy from nuclear in the future. France, which draws about 80% of its electricity from nuclear, is the strongest advocate. But domestic politics in several countries, such as Germany and the Czech Republic, are diverting reasonable energy policies from developing. Australia suffers from similarly silly domestic politics that block the implementation of sensible energy strategy.

    Two trends are developing: one is sweeping forward with nuclear energy to meet rising energy demands, and the other is retrenching on nuclear. The United States is straddling the fence, an unsustainable position.

    The good news is there is evidence that American nuclear energy will develop for the first time in 30 years. However, there is a marked difference between Barack Obama and John McCain on nuclear, and the presidential election could be telling of how this nation moves forward on the issue.

    McCain has been explicit and specific in his support of nuclear power and proposes a goal to build 45 new plants in the next 15 years. Barack Obama is unclear on the specifics of his energy plan; he vaguely supports nuclear energy but criticizes McCain’s 45 reactor goal by saying we first need a solution for nuclear waste. Even the left leaning Guardian has vilified Obama for avoiding nuclear energy.

    Here’s the take away: most of the world is poised to leap ahead with nuclear energy with only a few countries falling behind because of anti-nuclear ideology. The United States still receives 20% of its electricity from nuclear but faces an important decision as it searches for answers to global warming and meeting skyrocketing energy demands: Either side with the countries falling behind or push forward to reestablish commercial nuclear power as clean, safe, and affordable form of energy in America.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Nuclear at the Crossroad

    1. Darvin Dowdy, Houst says:

      So many of us oppose Sen. McCain on so many issues. "But" if his promise to build 45 new nuclear power plants is a serious promise – then that one issue alone is reason to vote for him. If he can push that through plus appoint another conservative supreme court judge or 2, [and some conservative lower court judges] and win the GWOT then we should all hold our nose and vote straight GOP. DD

    2. Dug, Wichita Ks. says:

      We have a very short period of time to start building the next generation of nuclear plants. The builders/work force is aging and moved on to other occupations. An example is the Non-Destruct test techs that use to follow the projects around the country because of their special skills and certifications required. You don't want outsoursed rookies working on your nuclear power plants!

    3. Danny Grimes Centra says:

      My Comment on Nuclear power: Aside from the cost to provide the energy if there is not a great substantial savings given directely to the user/ not only would i vote no, but i would ask who is going to consume irradiated food – from waste of the by product? Quick fixes- are just that, if there are consequences to be paid. Somebody better weigh them, we already have food problems because of big profits, to add to the disease that is already taken us, down the primrose -it will be clear who did what to whom.

    4. Pingback: The Energy Net » Top Nuclear Stories (July 10th-14)

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×