‘Veterans for Welfare’
Posted July 2nd, 2008 at 4.28pm in Entitlements, Protect America.
From the comments on the so called Webb GI Bill:
I am an active duty military officer with multiple Iraq deployments and continuing an active duty career.
It is time for veterans to be intellectually and philosophically honest and oppose this new brand of federal welfare sweeping through Congress in the name of patriotism and “serving those who have served” and all the other platitudes that are greasing the skids of the rapidly expanding welfare state. The left, intentionally or not, is scoring a huge government expansion win by targeting traditionally conservative, limited-government constituencies, with the federal largess.
When do the expansive benefits of the military become the modern equivalent of the Quartering Act of 1765? Perhaps it is time to take a liberal weapon — the expansive and malleable interpretation of the Constitution — and launch some Third Amendment challenges to the bloated veteran and military benefit programs out there.
As a mid-career junior officer, I was paid the taxable equivalent of more than $169,000 last year (about the same as a Congressman). Enlistment goals remain consistently met in excess of 100%. But we keep expanding pay and benefits and finance our bloated bureaucracy by borrowing from Red China.
I canceled my VFW lifetime membership, because I now see that organization is “Veterans For Welfare”.
Stop the expansion of the federal welfare state, stop the federal dollar domination of the academy that is fueling sky-rocketing tuitions.
Let me tell you a dirty little secret. This is note the “next greatest generation”. After years of warfare, wee are still barely scratching mere hours of World War II combat casualties.
Be honest. Starting with yourself.
- Publius, Washington D.C.

July 2, 2008 Ed Smithe, Virginia writes:
With all due respect to Publius, I watched a good friend of my family’s, a veteran in the care of the VA, completely neglected (in the VA retirement facility next to Catholic University) to the point where he was eventually placed in the care of the Washington DC VA medical center and died within a week (3 months overall in the retirement system).
There was one episode in particular that continues to stick in my mind, where my wife and I went to visit him in the retirement facility and found him confused, disoriented and covered in his own excrement (it had obviously been a number of hours if not a day that he was in this state). When we tried to muster a nurse to help him, it took nearly 30 minutes before someone showed up and pleaded that they had no idea that this man needed help (despite his roommate having complained about it hours earlier).
This individual, before he entered the VA retirement system was of sound mind and good health. Indeed, just months prior, he had been flown to the Pentagon to participate in a briefing on a matter that he would not divulge for national security reasons. In other words, it wasn’t old age that did this to him. And after seeing the way in which the nurse(s) reacted to the above episode (brushing it off), there is not a doubt in my mind that they did not take care of this man. Welfare indeed.
While I accept Publius’s argument (to a degree) that the VA system is a disaster, what I do not accept is that the perception that veterans are properly cared for in this country. When one considers the horror stories about our returning veterans of the Iraq war (especially with respect to mental health) it is unbelievable to me that Publius can’t find a moment in his rather brave statement to draw attention to the reality that there are some vets out there that still need help. Granted, the system is broken…but let’s at least try to fix it in such a way that it takes care of those that have sacrificed so much for our nation.
The other day I commented on a post that the Heritage Foundation wrote about President Obama and his plans to dramatically alter the “Faith Based Initiatives Program.” I’m glad to see that Heritage chooses to use its donors money in advancing the principle of welfare, or even defending its static Iraq position (all is well)–yet when it comes to Veterans, they are apparently left to defend themselves against fellow veterans that have fortunately been spared some of the more acute horrors of war.
If this is the new face of conservatism, it is no wonder that we’ve lost the Congress and have decided on John McCain as our standard-bearer.