Comments on: Obama Pulls Back on Nuclear http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Morning Bell: Where Does the Left Expect Our Energy to Come From? | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-80611 Morning Bell: Where Does the Left Expect Our Energy to Come From? | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:16:39 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-80611 [...] occasionally signals he is in favor of allowing new nuclear plants to be built, he also fails to address the serious policy hurdles that must be overcome for that construction to happen. The same is true of Obama’s embrace of coal. Like NASA’s James Hansen, Obama would [...] [...] occasionally signals he is in favor of allowing new nuclear plants to be built, he also fails to address the serious policy hurdles that must be overcome for that construction to happen. The same is true of Obama’s embrace of coal. Like NASA’s James Hansen, Obama would [...]

]]> By: MrC, Do.Dak. http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1796 MrC, Do.Dak. Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:18:24 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1796 Mr Obama wants to put the NUCLEAR material in the hands of the private sector? Don't we have enough problems with control of the personnel involved? I can just see Osama and Obama at a lunch social. Mr Obama wants to put the NUCLEAR material in the hands of the private sector? Don't we have enough problems with control of the personnel involved? I can just see Osama and Obama at a lunch social.

]]> By: PacificGatePost http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1769 PacificGatePost Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:07:56 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1769 OBAMA’S ARTISTRY OF THE AMBIGUOUS - It is not his lack of experience that will work against him. Obama would be well served by his hired help if it could move him to specifics on numerous critical fronts. Voters are looking for definitive action while they battle overwhelming increases in costs on all fronts. <a href="http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/06/obamas-artistry-of-ambiguous.html" rel="nofollow">http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama...</a> OBAMA’S ARTISTRY OF THE AMBIGUOUS – It is not his lack of experience that will work against him.

Obama would be well served by his hired help if it could move him to specifics on numerous critical fronts.

Voters are looking for definitive action while they battle overwhelming increases in costs on all fronts.

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama…

]]> By: Kevin, Denver http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1766 Kevin, Denver Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:23:21 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1766 The "intellectual Left's" energy policy can be summed up in two words: "Forget it." For all the criticism of anything proposed in the past year by somebody who's not a member of the "intellectual Left," I've seen NOTHING that even masquerades as a real solution from anyone on that side. Not a single time. The closest the "Left" - deliberately more inclusive to include the not-so-intellectual - has come to proposing an energy policy is alternative fuels including: wind turbines (that get rejected by Senator Kennedy - is he part of the "intellectual" or "not-so-intellectual"???); solar (that produces a toxic waste stream from production/manufacture that makes one's hair stand on end); and hybrids (which at best is part of the solution, but a far cry from a viable, workable, meaningful, long-term energy plan). I'm quite critical of Bush for only attacking the demand side of the fossil fuels market; I'm even more critical of the Left for offering nothing more than empty words on an issue so vital to this country. More of putting politics ahead of the country's best interests. The "intellectual Left's" energy policy can be summed up in two words: "Forget it." For all the criticism of anything proposed in the past year by somebody who's not a member of the "intellectual Left," I've seen NOTHING that even masquerades as a real solution from anyone on that side. Not a single time. The closest the "Left" – deliberately more inclusive to include the not-so-intellectual – has come to proposing an energy policy is alternative fuels including: wind turbines (that get rejected by Senator Kennedy – is he part of the "intellectual" or "not-so-intellectual"???); solar (that produces a toxic waste stream from production/manufacture that makes one's hair stand on end); and hybrids (which at best is part of the solution, but a far cry from a viable, workable, meaningful, long-term energy plan). I'm quite critical of Bush for only attacking the demand side of the fossil fuels market; I'm even more critical of the Left for offering nothing more than empty words on an issue so vital to this country. More of putting politics ahead of the country's best interests.

]]> By: Donald in Raleigh, N http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1762 Donald in Raleigh, N Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:25:52 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1762 Reference my last: Not to mention much of the home grown, intellectual Left. Reference my last: Not to mention much of the home grown, intellectual Left.

]]> By: Donald in Raleigh, N http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1761 Donald in Raleigh, N Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:24:43 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/25/obama-pulls-back-on-nuclear/#comment-1761 Forget it! The United States a Global Leader? You've got to be kidding. We can't have this. It would make the rest of the world and especially the Muslim world angry at us. Forget it! The United States a Global Leader? You've got to be kidding. We can't have this. It would make the rest of the world and especially the Muslim world angry at us.

]]>