- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Morning Bell: Two Steps Back
Posted By Conn Carroll On June 25, 2008 @ 9:12 am In Ongoing Priorities | Comments Disabled
The fight to rein in exploding Medicare spending through exposure to market forces took two giant steps back this week. First, the House voted early this week  to set aside regulations that would have allowed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to buy medical equipment through competitive bidding. Then yesterday, the House voted  to raid one of the most popular market-based health care initiatives: Medicare Advantage .
Since its creation in 2003, Medicare Advantage has helped more than 9 million Medicare recipients enroll in private health maintenance organizations (HMOs), local and regional preferred provider organizations (PPOs), and private fee-for-service (PFFS) health plans. The health plans cover all of traditional Medicare’s benefits and much more, including coordinated care and care-management programs for enrollees with chronic conditions as well as additional hospitalization and skilled nursing facility stays. Seniors can choose between plans with higher premiums and lower cost-sharing or those with lower premiums and higher cost-sharing.
According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Advantage enrollees receive, on average, an additional monthly value of $96 in added medical services compared to traditional Medicare recipients. Critics of Medicare Advantage point to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) data that shows Medicare payments for Medicare Advantage enrollees are 12% higher than traditional Medicare recipients, but this study ignores the extra health care Medicare Advantage enrollees are receiving. In addition, studies show  that increased enrollment in Medicare Advantage actually decreases government spending in the federal government’s other major health care program, Medicaid.
But the CBO data comparing traditional Medicare payments and Medicare Advantage is flawed for a more fundamental reason. Medicare reimbursement rates are set by a purely political process that has no relation to market realities. The good government central planner types have tried to ween Medicare into more “scientific” fee schedules , but the same vote that ripped billions from the Medicare Advantage program gave those billions to doctors whose payments were set to be cut by those efforts.
There are clearly problems with the payment methods for Medicare Advantage plans — mostly problems that stem from basing the methods on the flawed payment system of traditional Medicare. Medicare Advantage has been a success, but it is far short of comprehensive Medicare reform. Members of Congress who wish to see a fair and equitable Medicare payment system can achieve that most easily through a new system of premium support in which all plans could compete on a level playing field.
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/25/morning-bell-two-steps-back/
URLs in this post:
 the House voted early this week: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/business/25leonhardt.html?adxnnl=1&ref=todayspaper&adxnnlx=1214389540-Z0ixIjw3wCaJgID2d0S8gg
 the House voted: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/washington/25medicare.html?ref=todayspaper
 Medicare Advantage: http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthCare/bg2142.cfm
 studies show: http://www.magnetmail.net/images/clients/BCBSA1/attach/KenThorpeMAReport.pdf
 more “scientific” fee schedules: http://www.heritage.org/research/healthcare/bg865.cfm
 written by the very banks that will be receiving the government bailout: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/24/AR2008062401389.html
 constituent anger over his support for government benefits for illegal aliens: http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0608/Cannon_ousted_in_Republican_primary.html
 We-R-Your-Money: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11322.html
 narrowly avoided a vote on expanding domestic production of oil: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-06-24-house-gouging_N.htm
 up 40%: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-usafghan25-2008jun25,0,5493694.story
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.