• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Is Common Sense Coming To The New York Times?

    Last week the New York Times finally reported the fact that Europe’s carbon capping scheme is a complete disaster causing higher energy prices, weakening industries, and forcing jobs overseas … jobs … all while failing to reduce carbon emissions.

    Today the New York Times continues their streak of decent economic reporting, this time exposing Congressional efforts to keep market forces out of Medicare. From the NYT:

    For years, Congress has set the price for walkers and various medical equipment, and it has consistently set them well above the market rate, effectively handing out a few hundred million dollars of corporate welfare every year to the equipment makers.

    But as of July 1, this system is set to change. Companies will instead have to submit bids — to compete with one another, just as Wal-Mart competes with Target — if they want to continue selling products to Medicare. Based on a pilot program, the price of walkers, delivery and setup included, will fall to about $80. Now, would you like to guess how the equipment makers feel about this? Right.

    With the changeover looming, they have increased their contributions to Congress. They have also started publicly claiming that competitive bidding will, among other things, deprive some patients of oxygen equipment they need.

    The industry seems to be having some success, too. On Tuesday, the House overwhelmingly passed a sprawling Medicare bill that would throw out the initial bidding results. Pete Stark and John Dingell, two Democratic committee chairmen, and John Boehner, the House Republican leader, all pushed for the provision. The Senate will soon take up a similar bill.

    The Times then follows up with an editorial suggesting that Congressional fealty to politically set fee schedules calls into question government’s ability to control medical costs:

    This backtracking inevitably makes one wonder if major reform will ever be possible in a medical marketplace dominated by imperfect government bureaucracies and private lobbyists bent on resisting governmental reforms.

    We’ve heard this argument before. If the NYT keeps this up we may have to make them honorary members of the vast right wing conspiracy.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Is Common Sense Coming To The New York Times?

    1. Harry in Chicago says:

      Don't hold your breathe!

    2. Chaz says:

      The New York Times needs to be checked for aids,it is eating their brain cells. What a bunch of losers.

    3. Dave, laguna niguel, says:

      Dear New York Times, years ago you reported the news which is what was expected and appreciated of yours and any other newspaper and your subscriptions were decent. Suddenly you decided to SLANT your reporting in an effort to convince readers to lean to the left, the ultra far left. You made the decision to engage in mind control, along with the entire American news media complex. There are now millions of us who look forward to your demise.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×