- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

Morning Bell: What's the Worst Part of This Bill?

Posted By Conn Carroll On June 24, 2008 @ 8:46 am In Ongoing Priorities | Comments Disabled

Today the Senate is scheduled to vote on the housing bailout bill that has been circulating on Capitol Hill for so long its title today is simply “a bill to provide needed housing reform and for other purposes [1].” When a bill’s title includes the phrase “and for other purposes,” you know the American taxpayer is about to get a raw deal. This bill is such terrible public policy in so many different ways that it’s hard to pick which one is the worst. But we’ll try.

  • Bails out the banks most responsible for the current crisis [2]. The most important thing to remember about this “housing reform” bill is that checks for the mortgage bailout go directly to the banks that irresponsibly lent money to risky borrowers. That’s why Countrywide Financial [3] and Bank of America [4] have pushed so hard for this program. And since it is a voluntary program, the banks get to choose which loans they’ll pawn off on the  taxpayer. As a result, banks will keep the loans that have the best chance of being paid back, while the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) is forced to guarantee the riskiest borrowers.
  • Increases the risk of an even bigger taxpayer-funded bailout [5]. Between 2000 and 2007, the FHA increased its portfolio of no-down-payment loans from 2 percent to 37 percent. These loans default at almost three times the rate of other loans [6]. As we explained above, all of the $300 billion in loans the bill intends the FHA to take on will be preselected by banks as those with even higher default rates. The FHA posted losses of $4.6 billion last year. FHA’s losses, paid for by taxpayers, will skyrocket if this bailout passes.

  • Creates a special-interest slush fund [7]. Partisan leftist groups such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) have pushed for a federally funded National Housing Trust Fund for almost a decade now. During the brief economic downturn in 2001, ACORN advocated the fund as an economic stimulus. From 2003 through 2006 it promoted the fund as a solution to housing prices that were too high. Now ACORN argues it’s needed because housing prices are too low. A National Housing Trust Fund will make it easier for the left to funnel millions in taxpayer dollars down the drain of ACORN’s well-established history of fraud [8], deceit [9] and intimidation [10].

The bill does have one saving grace: It does contain much needed reform for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae [17]. The near-monopoly power these government-sponsored entities have in the mortgage industry was a key cause of the housing bubble. But conservatives shouldn’t let Freddie and Fannie’s needed reform of be held hostage. They deserve their own standalone bill.

Quick Hits:

Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/24/morning-bell-what-is-the-worst-part-of-this-bill/

URLs in this post:

[1] a bill to provide needed housing reform and for other purposes: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR03221:@@@T

[2] Bails out the banks most responsible for the current crisis: http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/12/morning-bell-the-wall-street-bailout-enhancement-act/

[3] Countrywide Financial: http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/13/the-countrywide-bailout-explained/

[4] Bank of America: http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/20/bank-of-america-drafted-dodd-bailout-bill/

[5] Increases the risk of an even bigger taxpayer-funded bailout: http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/06/morning-bell-why-is-congress-doubling-down-on-mortgage-mess/

[6] These loans default at almost three times the rate of other loans: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/business/09fha.html?scp=1&sq=rachel+swarns+&st=nyt

[7] Creates a special-interest slush fund: http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/28/morning-bell-slush-funds-for-reform-hostages/

[8] fraud: http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html

[9] deceit: http://wweek.com/editorial/2818/2532/

[10] intimidation: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/011255.php

[11] Creates a national fingerprint registry: http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/09/obama-among-supporters-of-national-fingerprint-registry/

[12] require thousands of individuals working even tangentially in the mortgage and real estate industries — and not suspected of anything — to send their prints to the feds: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26872

[13] Does nothing to actually help the economy: http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/05/why-is-congress-risking-billions-to-save-nothing/

[14] The Hill: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/its-irrelevant-how-many-are-helped-frank-2008-04-01.html

[15] would aid only 500,000 households over the next four years: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/02/AR2008050203731.html

[16] the plan would not be sweeping enough to restore the housing market or ailing economy: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1138482820080411

[17] much needed reform for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae: http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/21/morning-bell-holding-responsible-regulation-hostage/

[18] success in Basra, Mosul, Sadr City and now Amarah: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2008-06-23-iraqnews_N.htm

[19] sonar and dolphins: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2008-06-23-court_N.htm

[20] released 97 online videos last year: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062302135.html

[21] forced to hide in the Dutch Embassy: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/06/20/international/i040924D09.DTL

[22] rejected a proposal for yet another power plant: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/24/BARQ11E5DH.DTL

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.