Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Ethanol + Floods = More Pain at the Pump

Posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:38am in Energy and Environment 2 Print This Post Print This Post

Gas prices have already hit $4 a gallon nationally with no relief in sight. Given the flooding in the Midwest and the federal mandate that ethanol must be blended with gasoline before sale to consumers, the pain at the pump could only get worse. The floods could create upward pressure on gas prices in two distinct ways:

1.) As Stephen Schork, editor of The Schork Report in Philadelphia, emphasizes, “If we have prolonged rail and barge delays of getting Midwest ethanol to all the coast, then it will have an absolute upward impact on prices right now.”

2.) The flooding caused severe damage to crops in the farm belt: “In Iowa, the country’s top corn-growing state, more than 1.3 million acres of corn and 2 million acres of soybeans have been flooded; in total, about 16 percent of the state’s farmland is submerged.”

Congress should suspend for one year the federal mandate that requires ethanol to be blended with gasoline before sale to consumers. Alternatively or additionally, the suspension of the mandate should remain in force until oil prices fall to, say $60 a barrel and corn to some lower price per bushel. An implementation like this would not only alleviate the upward pressure on gas prices but would also reduce the price of food. A more effective move for Congress would be to eliminate the ethanol mandate, ethanol-related tax breaks, and protectionist tariffs that keep out potentially cheaper foreign supplies.

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “Ethanol + Floods = More Pain at the Pump”

  1. Steve-SD on at said:

    That makes a lot of sense. Take 6% of the fuel out of the market. I am sure that will cause oil prices to tumble. Are you really serious? The latest numbers I’ve seen have ethanol responsible for 2-3% of the increase in food prices. At the same time ethanol is contributing to a decrease of 15% in gasoline prices. Get real.

  2. Rolf McEwen on at said:

    Well stated, Steve. I see it like you do. The addition of ethanol as transportation fuel in the US reduces the demand for gasoline and oil. Without the added ethanol, gas prices would be higher than they are currently. More ethanol reduces demand for oil. Oil increases in price from $1 to $2 to $3 to $4 and now at $4.25 in Oregon, which makes ethanol a bargain and its contribution to the fuel market reduces demand for gas. Good.

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.